We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

cs.CY

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Computer Science > Computers and Society

Title: Law Informs Code: A Legal Informatics Approach to Aligning Artificial Intelligence with Humans

Authors: John J. Nay
Abstract: We are currently unable to specify human goals and societal values in a way that reliably directs AI behavior. Law-making and legal interpretation form a computational engine that converts opaque human values into legible directives. "Law Informs Code" is the research agenda capturing complex computational legal processes, and embedding them in AI. Similar to how parties to a legal contract cannot foresee every potential contingency of their future relationship, and legislators cannot predict all the circumstances under which their proposed bills will be applied, we cannot ex ante specify rules that provably direct good AI behavior. Legal theory and practice have developed arrays of tools to address these specification problems. For instance, legal standards allow humans to develop shared understandings and adapt them to novel situations. In contrast to more prosaic uses of the law (e.g., as a deterrent of bad behavior through the threat of sanction), leveraged as an expression of how humans communicate their goals, and what society values, Law Informs Code.
We describe how data generated by legal processes (methods of law-making, statutory interpretation, contract drafting, applications of legal standards, legal reasoning, etc.) can facilitate the robust specification of inherently vague human goals. This increases human-AI alignment and the local usefulness of AI. Toward society-AI alignment, we present a framework for understanding law as the applied philosophy of multi-agent alignment. Although law is partly a reflection of historically contingent political power - and thus not a perfect aggregation of citizen preferences - if properly parsed, its distillation offers the most legitimate computational comprehension of societal values available. If law eventually informs powerful AI, engaging in the deliberative political process to improve law takes on even more meaning.
Comments: Forthcoming in Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, Volume 20
Subjects: Computers and Society (cs.CY); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2209.13020 [cs.CY]
  (or arXiv:2209.13020v8 [cs.CY] for this version)

Submission history

From: John Nay [view email]
[v1] Wed, 14 Sep 2022 00:49:09 GMT (806kb)
[v2] Thu, 29 Sep 2022 17:04:40 GMT (855kb)
[v3] Sun, 2 Oct 2022 23:54:11 GMT (1184kb)
[v4] Wed, 12 Oct 2022 13:25:23 GMT (1567kb)
[v5] Mon, 24 Oct 2022 18:55:39 GMT (1734kb)
[v6] Mon, 31 Oct 2022 20:32:13 GMT (1734kb)
[v7] Fri, 4 Nov 2022 14:20:52 GMT (1736kb)
[v8] Mon, 5 Dec 2022 20:39:08 GMT (1938kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.