Current browse context:
cond-mat.mtrl-sci
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Condensed Matter > Materials Science
Title: Efficiency versus effort: a better way to compare best photovoltaic research cell efficiencies?
(Submitted on 27 Sep 2022 (v1), revised 29 Sep 2022 (this version, v2), latest version 19 Nov 2022 (v3))
Abstract: Frequently, trends in record AM1.5 power-conversion efficiencies versus time are used to analyze relative merits of different photovoltaic material technologies. However, this approach belies the effort expended in achieving these levels of performance. We introduce cumulative publications as a proxy for total R&D efforts and find surprisingly that silicon, Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGSe), CdTe, and halide perovskite technologies have each followed essentially the same learning curve of 20-24% efficiency within 10,000 publications and a consistent marginal rate of 5% efficiency per factor of 10 in publications. While learning spillover from non-PV technologies, cross-pollination from other PV technologies, and hidden commercial effort are not accounted for by this metric, this analysis still yields useful and novel insights into PV technology trajectories. Trajectories below this learning curve have required more total effort per performance and plateaus of efficiency stagnation at large numbers of publications may indicate (but do not guarantee) the existence of fundamental barriers to commercially-relevant performance. Lastly, examples to watch are identified for technologies currently exhibiting higher marginal slopes, including some that appeared dormant by this metric in past years.
Submission history
From: Phillip Dale [view email][v1] Tue, 27 Sep 2022 18:15:25 GMT (712kb)
[v2] Thu, 29 Sep 2022 14:46:32 GMT (488kb)
[v3] Sat, 19 Nov 2022 17:13:42 GMT (497kb)
Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.