We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

cond-mat.supr-con

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Condensed Matter > Superconductivity

Title: Comment on "Absence versus Presence of Dissipative Quantum Phase Transition in Josephson Junctions''

Abstract: In a recent Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 087001, (2022)], Masuki, Sudo, Oshikawa, and Ashida studied a Josephson junction, with Josephson energy $E_{\rm J}$ and charging energy $E_{\rm C}$, shunted by an ohmic transmission line with conductance $\alpha (2e)^2/h$. Their model includes a realistic high frequency cutoff of order $\alpha E_c$, that is typically smaller than the plasma frequency $W$. The authors present a phase diagram showing surprising features, not anticipated in the established literature [eg. Sch\"on and Zaikin, Phys. Reports 198, 237, (1990)]. For $E_{\rm J}/E_{\rm C}$ above a certain value, they find that the junction remains superconducting for all $\alpha$, while below this value, they find that the insulating phase leads to re-entrant superconductivity at small $\alpha$. In this Comment, we show that their Numerical Renormalization Group (NRG) implementation is uncontrolled, and that there is no evidence for the re-entrant superconductivity in the phase diagram presented in Fig. 1a of PRL 129, 087001.
Comments: 3 pages. Text of the version accepted for publication, plus an appendix with additional information
Subjects: Superconductivity (cond-mat.supr-con); Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics (cond-mat.mes-hall)
Cite as: arXiv:2210.00742 [cond-mat.supr-con]
  (or arXiv:2210.00742v2 [cond-mat.supr-con] for this version)

Submission history

From: Izak Snyman [view email]
[v1] Mon, 3 Oct 2022 07:23:50 GMT (96kb,D)
[v2] Tue, 24 Oct 2023 14:35:53 GMT (156kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.