Title: How (Not) to Reform India's Affirmative Action Policies for its Economically Weaker Segments

Abstract: In India, various groups are protected with a vertical reservation (VR) policy, which sets aside a fraction of government positions and public school seats for each protected group. By law, the protected positions are processed after those open to all applicants, thus assuring that they are awarded to individuals who otherwise cannot receive open positions. Historically, the VR-protected groups have been various Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBCs), whose members suffered marginalization due to their caste identities. This structure also means that no individual can belong to multiple VR-protected groups; thereby, deeming the processing sequence of VR-protected groups immaterial. A 2019 amendment to the constitution granted economically weaker sections (EWS) with vertical reservations, but limited its eligibility to members of forward castes who are ineligible for SEBC positions. As such, individuals still cannot belong to multiple VR-protected groups under the amendment. The Amendment was immediately brought to court, and its exclusion of SEBCs was challenged. In September 2022, a compromise that is discussed at the Supreme Court involves maintaining the amendment, but expanding its scope to include SEBCs. If adopted in the country, individuals can belong to multiple VR-protected groups. Therefore, if the Supreme Court mandates the compromise without specifying how EWS positions are to be processed, a major loophole in the system will emerge. If EWS positions are processed after SEBC positions, then the result is a true compromise which provides the benefits of the EWS positions to all individuals with financial disabilities. If, however, EWS positions are processed prior to SEBC positions, then the result is virtually equivalent to the elimination of EWS reservation.