Title: How (Not) to Reform India's Affirmative Action Policies for its Economically Weaker Segments

Abstract: Various groups in India are protected with a vertical reservation (VR) policy, which sets aside a share of public positions for these groups. VR-protected positions are processed by law after those open to all, assuring that they are awarded to individuals who do not merit open positions. Historically, VR protections were exclusive to groups who suffered discrimination due to their caste identities. This structure means that no individual can belong to multiple VR-protected groups, which implies that the processing sequence of VR-protected groups is immaterial. A Constitutional Amendment in 2019 granted economically weaker sections (EWS) VR protections, but limited its eligibility to members of upper castes who are ineligible for caste-based VR protections. The amendment was immediately brought to court, and the exclusion of caste-based VR-protected groups was challenged due to its violation of Right to Equality. A compromise that emerged at the Supreme Court involves maintaining the amendment, but expanding its scope to include the excluded groups. If this policy is adopted, individuals can belong to multiple VR-protected groups. We show that a major loophole will emerge, if the Supreme Court only expands the scope of EWS without specifying how its positions are processed. Depending on which normative objective the court wants to promote, we formulate and characterize three plausible specifications. If EWS is processed simultaneously with other VR-protected groups, then the outcome is one that selects the most meritorious individuals subject to the Court's mandates. If EWS is processed before other VR-protected groups, then the outcome maintains the elevated status of caste-based VR protections. If EWS is processed after other VR-protected groups, then the outcome is the smallest possible change from the contested amendment that escapes a violation of Right to Equality.