We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

math.NT

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Mathematics > Number Theory

Title: How negative can $\sum_{n\le x}\frac{f(n)}{n}$ be?

Abstract: Tur\'an observed that logarithmic partial sums $\sum_{n\le x}\frac{f(n)}{n}$ of completely multiplicative functions (in the particular case of the Liouville function $f(n)=\lambda(n)$) tend to be positive. We develop a general approach to prove two results aiming to explain this phenomena. Firstly, we show that for every $\varepsilon>0$ there exists some $x_0\ge 1,$ such that for any completely multiplicative function $f$ satisfying $-1\le f(n)\le 1$, we have $$\sum_{n\le x}\frac{f(n)}{n}\ge -\frac{1}{(\log\log{x})^{1-\varepsilon}}, \quad x\ge x_0.$$ This improves a previous bound due to Granville and Soundararajan. Secondly, we show that if $f$ is a typical (random) completely multiplicative function $f:\mathbb{N}\to \{-1,1\}$, the probability that $\sum_{n\le x}\frac{f(n)}{n}$ is negative for a given large $x,$ is $O(\exp(-\exp(\frac{\log x\cdot \log\log\log x}{C\log \log x}))).$ This improves on recent work of Angelo and Xu.
Comments: 14 pages
Subjects: Number Theory (math.NT); Probability (math.PR)
Cite as: arXiv:2211.05540 [math.NT]
  (or arXiv:2211.05540v1 [math.NT] for this version)

Submission history

From: Oleksiy Klurman [view email]
[v1] Thu, 10 Nov 2022 12:55:31 GMT (14kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.