We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

cs.HC

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Computer Science > Human-Computer Interaction

Title: Why Are Conversational Assistants Still Black Boxes? The Case For Transparency

Abstract: Much has been written about privacy in the context of conversational and voice assistants. Yet, there have been remarkably few developments in terms of the actual privacy offered by these devices. But how much of this is due to the technical and design limitations of speech as an interaction modality? In this paper, we set out to reframe the discussion on why commercial conversational assistants do not offer meaningful privacy and transparency by demonstrating how they \emph{could}. By instrumenting the open-source voice assistant Mycroft to capture audit trails for data access, we demonstrate how such functionality could be integrated into big players in the sector like Alexa and Google Assistant. We show that this problem can be solved with existing technology and open standards and is thus fundamentally a business decision rather than a technical limitation.
Comments: To appear in the Proceedings of the 2023 ACM conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI 23)
Subjects: Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
DOI: 10.1145/3571884.3604319
Cite as: arXiv:2306.05218 [cs.HC]
  (or arXiv:2306.05218v1 [cs.HC] for this version)

Submission history

From: William Seymour [view email]
[v1] Thu, 8 Jun 2023 14:17:20 GMT (1296kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.