Why not a superfluid solid?

Anderson, Philip W.

Full-text links:

Download:

PDF only

Current browse context:

cond-mat

< prev | next >

new | recent | 0504

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Bookmark

(what is this?)

Condensed Matter > Other Condensed Matter

Title: Why not a superfluid solid?

Authors: Philip W. Anderson

(Submitted on 5 Apr 2005 (v1), last revised 23 Jan 2012 (this version, v3))

Abstract: The question of whether a Bose solid can have a superfluid fraction in the absence of interstitials, holes or other defects is discussed. An unlikely scenario which may accommodate this possibility is proposed, based on a Hartree-Fock treatment of the quantum solid. It is now believed that this version is correct

Comments:	arXiv admin note: significant text overlap with arXiv:cond-mat/0504731
Subjects:	Other Condensed Matter (cond-mat.other); Statistical Mechanics (cond-mat.stat-mech)
Cite as:	arXiv:cond-mat/0504111 [cond-mat.other]
	(or arXiv:cond-mat/0504111v3 [cond-mat.other] for this version)

Submission history

From: Philip Anderson [view email]
[v1] Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:23:14 GMT (251kb)
[v2] Sun, 24 Apr 2005 14:55:09 GMT (14kb)
[v3] Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:31:12 GMT (251kb)

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.