References & Citations
High Energy Physics - Theory
Title: Geometric phases and hidden local gauge symmetry
(Submitted on 11 May 2005 (v1), last revised 19 Jul 2005 (this version, v2))
Abstract: The analysis of geometric phases associated with level crossing is reduced to the familiar diagonalization of the Hamiltonian in the second quantized formulation. A hidden local gauge symmetry, which is associated with the arbitrariness of the phase choice of a complete orthonormal basis set, becomes explicit in this formulation (in particular, in the adiabatic approximation) and specifies physical observables. The choice of a basis set which specifies the coordinate in the functional space is arbitrary in the second quantization, and a sub-class of coordinate transformations, which keeps the form of the action invariant, is recognized as the gauge symmetry. We discuss the implications of this hidden local gauge symmetry in detail by analyzing geometric phases for cyclic and noncyclic evolutions. It is shown that the hidden local symmetry provides a basic concept alternative to the notion of holonomy to analyze geometric phases and that the analysis based on the hidden local gauge symmetry leads to results consistent with the general prescription of Pancharatnam. We however note an important difference between the geometric phases for cyclic and noncyclic evolutions. We also explain a basic difference between our hidden local gauge symmetry and a gauge symmetry (or equivalence class) used by Aharonov and Anandan in their definition of generalized geometric phases.
Submission history
From: Kazuo Fujikawa [view email][v1] Wed, 11 May 2005 05:52:15 GMT (19kb)
[v2] Tue, 19 Jul 2005 03:35:20 GMT (19kb)
Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.