We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

quant-ph

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Quantum Physics

Title: Comment on "Why quantum mechanics cannot be formulated as a Markov process"

Abstract: In the paper with the above title, D. T. Gillespie [Phys. Rev. A 49, 1607, (1994)] claims that the theory of Markov stochastic processes cannot provide an adequate mathematical framework for quantum mechanics. In conjunction with the specific quantum dynamics considered there, we give a general analysis of the associated dichotomic jump processes. If we assume that Gillespie's "measurement probabilities" \it are \rm the transition probabilities of a stochastic process, then the process must have an invariant (time independent) probability measure. Alternatively, if we demand the probability measure of the process to follow the quantally implemented (via the Born statistical postulate) evolution, then we arrive at the jump process which \it can \rm be interpreted as a Markov process if restricted to a suitable duration time. However, there is no corresponding Markov process consistent with the $Z_2$ event space assumption, if we require its existence for all times $t\in R_+$.
Comments: Latex file, resubm. to Phys. Rev. A
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Journal reference: Phys.Rev. A54 (1996) 1733-1736
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.1733
Cite as: arXiv:quant-ph/9601016
  (or arXiv:quant-ph/9601016v1 for this version)

Submission history

From: Piotr Garbaczewski [view email]
[v1] Tue, 16 Jan 1996 12:23:45 GMT (6kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.