We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

quant-ph

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Quantum Physics

Title: The Trouble with Quantum Bit Commitment

Authors: Dominic Mayers (Universite de Montreal)
Abstract: In a recent paper, Lo and Chau explain how to break a family of quantum bit commitment schemes, and they claim that their attack applies to the 1993 protocol of Brassard, Cr\'epeau, Jozsa and Langlois (BCJL). The intuition behind their attack is correct, and indeed they expose a weakness common to all proposals of a certain kind, but the BCJL protocol does not fall in this category. Nevertheless, it is true that the BCJL protocol is insecure, but the required attack and proof are more subtle. Here we provide the first complete proof that the BCJL protocol is insecure.
Comments: 12 pages in revtex (preprint). This revised version contains one minor algebraic modification
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:quant-ph/9603015
  (or arXiv:quant-ph/9603015v3 for this version)

Submission history

From: Dominic Mayers [view email]
[v1] Mon, 11 Mar 1996 02:50:49 GMT (9kb)
[v2] Sat, 23 Mar 1996 22:42:30 GMT (0kb,I)
[v3] Sun, 4 Aug 1996 18:18:49 GMT (9kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.