arXiv:cond-mat/0310745v1 [cond-mat.soft] 30 Oct 2003
Textural Analysis of a Mesophase with Banana Shaped Molecules.
Yu.A. Nastishin1,2,
M.F. Achard1, H.T. Nguyen1, M. Kleman3
1Centre de Recherche Paul Pascal, CNRS, Université
Bordeaux 1, Pessac, France
2Institute of Physical
Optics,
3Laboratoire de Minéralogie-Cristallographie
de Paris, Université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie,Paris, France
The existence of a liquid crystal (LC) state in materials
with bent- (banana-) shaped molecules was first documented in 1929 by Vorlander [1,2]. For
a long time no special interest was taken in such mesogens
and they were simply called ‘bad rod’ phases.
The quantity of papers studying such a type of LC’s
increased rapidly when the authors of reference [3] reported ferroelectric
properties in such materials. Several
hundreds banana compounds have been synthesized since [4-15]. Because of their spectacular textures (in
some cases electrically switchable) that differ with
those of conventional rod-like smectics, these mesophases were identified as novel LC phases and labeled ‘Bn’ [4], with n =1,2,…,8 refereeing to the
time sequence of their experimental discoveries. Some of them were later identified as 3D
crystals. However there are X-ray and
textural evidences that some Bn phases exhibit
either 1D or 2D discrete translation ordering.
Because in many cases the Bn
classification is not based on structural information, the identification of mesophases in newly synthesized banana-shaped compounds
might be ambiguous and confusing.
These
difficulties are especially pronounced for the B7 phase, the most
intricate and most poorly understood of the B phases. The first mesophase
with the B7 label was found in nitro derivatives (n-OPIMB-NO2
[10] of the parent series of banana shaped compounds. The X-ray patterns for unaligned samples show
a diffuse scattering in the wide-angle region indicating a liquid-like local
order. Several peaks are observed at small angles. The most intense, with
several harmonics, corresponds to a length comparable to the molecular length
and can be assigned to a smectic periodicity. However
the presence of other incommensurate peaks excludes a simple layered structure
and the observation of reflections at very small angles suggest a structure of
modulated layers at a larger scale [8].
Comparable X-ray patterns have been found in other compounds (DnF3 [8])
labeled B7bis; it was remarked
that in partially oriented samples some of the additional X-ray peaks point in
directions that are different from the main peak direction, suggesting additional
translation ordering
in the plane of the layers. Furthermore,
recent electron microscopy observations of freeze-fractured specimens presented
by Clark et al. [16] show that the structure of the B7 phase of
MHOBOW shows periodically modulated layers with a modulation length of about 50
nm; the direction of the modulation is preserved through the layers
stacking. Therefore the liquid like
character of the layers is 1D. Some
recent results indicate that the layer structure is made of interdigitated
(frustrated) columns [17]. A lamello-columnar model has also been advanced on a
theoretical basis [18]. According to
[18a], the B7 phase, although made of achiral
molecules, has no mirror planes: it is a chiral
phase, divided into domains of opposite chirality
(having the same free energy density) separated by walls, but showing no helicity, i.e. no twist of the columnar
directions in the ground state [i]. The same authors [18b] claim that the local
order might be tetrahedratic.
The
samples of this phase appear to be highly defective when the traditional
alignment techniques are used. In
particular one observes impressive assemblies of helical nuclei
(ribbon like) growing from the isotropic phase.
Because the interpretation of the X-ray data for powder samples is
somewhat ambiguous, the present identification of the B7 phase actually
contents oneself with the evidence of these helical ribbons (HR). The reason to choose such a feature as a
basis for the mesophase identification is related to
the fact that the banana molecules are not chiral;
and indeed it was observed at the time of the first identification of the B7
phase [10], that the spontaneous growth of HR’s from achiral molecules has never been documented for other LC
phases. However later it was found that the HR’s can also be formed in banana smectics
with simple fluid layers (SmSG), on
cooling of the isotropic phase [11]. Hence,
the observation of helical domains is not a sufficient criterion to assign a B7
label to a mesophase.
Notice also that helical domains are frequently met in condensed matter
physics. Some
solid crystals, e.g. sodium ammonium and quartz single crystals grow
either in the left or right form; on the other hand, the presence of HR’s or of other helical features is documented in a wealth
of organic systems with molecular chirality (phospholipidic membranes [19, 20] and biopolymers with
helical nuclei [21]) or without, (helical features in chrysotiles
[22,23]). It is also well known that
polymeric (e.g., polyethylene) spherulites may
take shapes which imply the presence of twisted ribbons [24].
We
shall rely in the sequel on a model with lamello-columnar
ordering and a strong anisotropy of the bond strength between columns;
the strength of bond is different depending whether the two neighboring
columns belong to the same layer or to two adjacent layers. The B7 phase
investigated in [5] does not form free-standing films as smectics
usually do. Contrariwise, free-standing
strands are stable. This is an argument
supporting some kind of prevalence of the columnar structure of the B7 phase,
over the layered structure. In other B7
phases, free-standing films might be preferred, indicating different physical
properties in different materials. An intralayer modulation period much larger than the smectic periodicity is also present in the lamellar phase
of nucleosome core particles, stacked into columns
[25], but in this case the particles are chiral.
The
textural analysis, as a technique capable to derive the internal structure of a
phase via observed textures, actually did not contribute yet to the collection
of essential information about the structure of the B7 phase. Our aim is to relate the partially
successful structural information we have presented above to the polarization
microscopy observations. To achieve this
goal we present our own observations in the next section, after a presentation
of the materials that we have used, focusing the attention to the observations
that shed light on the structure of the B7bis phase in
the compound D14F3. We find some new
details that were not reported yet. The
description of the textures is accompanied by the analysis of the observed
signatures. Simple geometrical models inspired by previous models devised in
other contexts, one relating to screw dislocations with a giant Burgers vector,
the other one to developable domains, give an adequate description of the
observed textures; they are presented in Section 3. Conclusions are summarized in Section 4.
As
mentioned above, the first B7 phase was found in 2-nitro substituted
resorcinol derivatives n-OPIMB-NO2 [10] (Fig. 1,
compound 1a). Similar textures and
comparable X-ray patterns have been found in DnF3 series (Fig. 1, compound 2,
with n = 9-14) in which the position of the azomethine
and ester connecting groups have been exchanged with reference to n-OPIMB
structure and a fluorine atom substituted on the external phenyl rings [8]. In
the present case, the B7 mesophase of DnF3
materials present a ‘ferroelectric’ switching while the n-OPIMB-NO2
mesophase has no electric response. Again, one notices that there are differences
in the physical properties of B7 phases observed in different
materials. In addition, there is no experimental
evidence of a complete miscibility of the B7 phases of n-OPIMB-NO2
and of DnF3 compounds [8] and thus, to avoid misunderstanding, the
authors proposed to use the ‘B7bis’ label for D9F3-D14F3
materials. However we find that the B7
and the B7bis phases have the same structure, hence the same
defects and textures [8].
A comparison of the textures and defects above
with those pertaining to two purely lamellar banana phases will also
be presented: the B2 mesophase found in
the non substituted n-OPIMB series [3] (compound 1b), which corresponds
to a switchable SmC phase,
and the lamellar phase of the 10-OPIMB-F3 (compound 1c). The mesophase of
this last material was first designated as a B7 since helical defects
have been observed [26, 27], but reinvestigation by X-ray analysis
unambiguously shows a simple layer structure [8,11,16].
The optical
textures of the mesophases were observed through a
polarizing microscope (Leitz Diavert)
equipped with a hot stage (Mettler FP-82HT) and an
automatic controller (Mettler FP-90). The temperature was controlled and stabilized
with 0.1°C accuracy.
The samples were observed on regular glass slides, treated for homeotropic or planar alignment, or on glycerol substrates.
The thickness of the samples prepared between two substrates was quite large
(about 1mm) allowing to examine B7 nuclei freely floating in the
isotropic phase.
Here and everywhere in this paper fast cooling means that
the sample was left to cool down without special setting of the cooling
rate. The cooling rate was estimated to
be a few tenths of a degree per minute (»
0.3-0.5 °C/min). The D14F3
compound exhibits a B7bis phase immediately below
the isotropic phase [8]. When quickly
cooled from isotropic phase, the B7bis phase nucleates in the form
of numerous flexible HR’s. There are HR’s of both helicities. To be
more precise, there are two types of ribbons: slim (S) and fat (F)[ii]. They can be easily distinguished under
the polarization microscope by their textures (compare Fig. 2a,b and c-h). They both look like double helices. S-ribbons (Fig. 2a,b) are very flexible;
between crossed polarizers they look gray, because of
their low birefringence. Contrariwise,
F-ribbons can be of very different shapes (Fig. 2c-f); they are rigid, rod-like
and highly birefringent; they show intense colors
between crossed polarizers. They also differ by the ratio of their pitch
over the diameter p/D (see below). We think that the F-ribbons are modifications
of the S-ribbons, which occur on their further growth.
The final textures (Fig. 3)
are not similar to any texture of conventional smectics. The distortions do not relax and defects do
not seem to be mobile. In particular,
there is no evidence of focal conic domains (FCD’s).
This latter remark is of some
importance; it is well known that the existence of liquid layers is at the
origin of FCD textures, eg., in SmA’s and even in SmC’s, although
in this last case the normal to the layers is not an axis of continuous
rotational symmetry. One can infer that, reciprocally, the absence of FCD’s is the signature of the absence of liquid smectic layers. In
fact, this claim has to be qualified: in
our case, the layers do exist, but they are 1D fluid, not 2D as it is in
conventional SmA’s or SmC’s. This difference suffices to prevent the
formation of well-developed FCD’s.
We
failed to prepare a uniformly oriented cell using the substrates treated for homeotropic as well as for planar alignment. It seems that the anchoring conditions do not
have any influence on the texture of the cell. The final textures (Fig.3) are
totally predetermined by the nucleation process, namely by the size and shape
of the growing nuclei. This feature indicates that the relaxation of
distortions is not of a smectic type. Indeed, observing the nucleation of smectic phases from their isotropic phases one can notice
that the boundaries between neighboring nuclei disappear when they touch each
other during growth. The boundaries of
separate smectic nuclei are totally washed out from
the texture quite quickly by the relaxation, which is of 2D fluid type for smectics. In the
case of the B7bis phase the nuclei do not merge
together. Newly born HR’s
often wind about already existing HR’s without
merging (Fig. 2d,g,h). When a growing
helical nucleus meets another nucleus it may stop to grow, or might
break and start to grow in another direction. When two nuclei come into contact, their
shapes do not change at all or change very little. The final texture is composed of set of ‘frozen’
nuclei (Fig.3). For example the banana
leaf nucleus (Fig.3c), that we attempted to grow carefully, did not change
shape after contact with other nuclei.
We are then led to conclude that for the B7bis phase
the relaxation of distortions is quite a slow process and might be of a fluid
type but not more than in one dimension, as in columnar phases.
When
quenching the sample from the high temperature isotropic phase region, as
discussed above, the only nucleus shapes one observes are HR’s. But when the sample is cooled slowly from the
isotropic phase prepared at a lower
temperature, the set of observed shapes is much richer. The minimal cooling rate that could be
imposed by our hot stage was 0.1 °C/min.
To obtain a slower cooling rate, the sample was cooled down by 0.1°C
steps with annealing pauses of several minutes between steps. Such a cooling procedure is possible because
the temperature range of the biphasic region of banana materials is usually
quite large (more than 1°C).
(i)- we have observed that the F-HR’s
(Fat Helical Ribbons), Fig. 2 c-h, relax slowly in the course of time to a
variety of shapes. The relaxation of
these geometries, whatever their shape, displays a unique feature, namely that
the F-HR’s transform into figures with no helicity, which in the nicest case (probably in the absence
of contact with the substrates) have an axisymmetric,
spindle, shape, Fig. 4a. But if,
during the transformation, these objects meet the substrate, they then form
flat domains that in their final form have the shape of a banana leaf, see Fig.
3c.
Our
observations show that the transformation of the F-helical structure (nonzero
pitch) into spindles or flat domains (in both last cases there is no helicity left) is not continuous, but is based on a process
that is akin to a Volterra process; the comparison
will be given its full scope in section 3.4.
Fig. 4b demonstrates that at some moments during annealing (as well as
on cooling) the HR spontaneously splits along a meridian half-plane (called
below the cut surface, see Fig. 4b and the schematical
drawings below the photographs). In the sequel, we call such an intermediate
object (second and third photos from the left in fig. 4b) an opened ribbon. It is evident that when the F-HR is cut as
described above the ribbon is not helical anymore. We believe that the transformation F-HR to
an opened ribbon occurs when the HR achieves a critical size above which
it does not grow any longer. In contrast
to the HR, the growth of an opened ribbon is not limited in size. On growing the opened ribbon might touch the
substrate. It then adopts a flat
geometry dictated by the finite thickness of the cell, forming a banana leaf as
mentioned above. A banana leaf is often
observed in thin samples (with a thickness of a few microns), where growing
nuclei touch both substrates from the very beginning of their growth. In some cases when the initial HR is not very
thick and located far from the substrates the sides of the opened ribbon can
again come together, transforming the opened ribbon into a spindle with a k =
+1 central disclination, Fig.4a, 4c, Fig.5. Fig. 4c demonstrates the final moment of the
transformation from an opened ribbon to a spindle. When moving the focus of the microscope from
the center to the surface, Fig. 4c, it is found that the line shown by the
white arrow is seen only when the microscope is focused in the central
part. Contrariwise, the two other lines,
shown by black arrows in Fig. 4c, are well seen at any focusing between the
center and the surface. These two lines
indicate the position of the cut surface of the opened ribbon. This cut surface shortens in the course of
time during annealing, (as well as on cooling).
Simultaneously the central line propagates. Hence the opened ribbon
spontaneously closes, transforming into a spindle, as schematically shown in
Fig.4c. We observed that, when growing
(or melting), the impurities attached to the surface of a spindle follow a
trajectory spiraling in a plane perpendicular to the axis of the object. Thus, we conclude that the spindles are
nothing else but developable domains (DD), well known in columnar phases [29],
differing then slightly from objects of revolution. It is important to stress
that the reverse heating of the DD’s never results in the appearance of HR’s even up to complete melting. Therefore the
transformation HR®DD is not reversible,
indicating that the HR’s correspond to a metastable state.
(ii)-
Finally, one can observe, as a result of a very slow cooling from the isotropic
phase, spiraling stripes forming domains that are very similar to DD’s
(Fig.6). The domain shown by white
arrows in Fig. 6 has a spiraling form like a DD and is definitely not a
FCD. The structure of a DD is
schematically shown in the insert in Fig.4c.
In
some cases the annealing transformations described above result in the
appearance of spherical objects with double conical defects with the apex
located in the center of the nuclei (Fig. 5).
These objects have all the features of a special type of developable domain
(schematically represented in Fig. 5b), first devised in [29],
Fig. 8 (see also [30], Fig. 10.14), and called there a singular point.
Fig.7 shows that, in contrast to the smectic
myelinic forms, the sections of the B7bis
nuclei are not circular but rather well faceted (shown by arrows in Fig.
7). The well-developed polygons of Fig.
7 are akin to the textures of a thermotropic columnar
phase with columns starting at the substrate and propagating into the
bulk. Fig.7 indicates a 2D positional
ordering in the B7bis phase.
In this
section we discuss the growth processes of the HR’s
and of the other shapes that have been observed, and compare them with the
usual growth processes of LC’s.
(i)- HR’s (both types), slow
cooling. The LC phase under investigation exhibits unidirectional
growth: the growth rate along the axis of a HR is much higher than it is
for all other directions. In fact up to
the moment when the transformation HR®DD
takes place, the lateral growth is not visible, and the HR’s
apparently have a constant width. This indicates that the LC structure has one
preferential space direction to which molecules can be attached much more
easily than to other directions.
The
HR growth from the isotropic phase is at variance with the usual picture of the
growth of Sm phases, which looks multidirectional.
Let us recall that the usual nuclei which grow from the isotropic phase in a Sm are Friedel’s bâtonnets.
The layers are perpendicular everywhere to the interface between the bâtonnet and the isotropic phase and are arranged
inside into numerous fragmented FCD’s of various
sizes and orientations; the bâtonnets grow by
attaching molecules to the layer cross-sections at the interface. Thus, the growth looks eventually
multidirectional. Other nucleus shapes
are documented for SmA’s (myelinic
forms that grow along their cylinder axis in heterogeneous compounds, see [31]
and references within; the same was observed for a one-component compound
[32]). But in all those cases the local
growth occurs by attaching new molecules to a layer cross-section.
The HR nucleation is
definitely at variance with this picture.
We observe no FCD’s, no bâtonnets,
no coalescence where the nuclei enter into contact, and the lateral size of the
nuclei is finite and well defined. A B7 phase is definitely different
from a Sm phase.
(ii)-
Nucleus Shapes in Other Growth Conditions.
Let us point out that if the liquid crystal domains are not totally
melted, in an incomplete heating process, the remaining scraps serve as seeds
for the growth under further cooling. In
such a case the shape of the seed from which it originates predetermines the
shape of the growing nucleus[iii]. We remind that for smectics the shape of a seed does not influence much
the shape of the growing nuclei: smectics do not
exhibit growth memory and the relaxation processes are akin to those of a 2D
fluid. As a result the nucleus shape
transforms so much during the growth process that usually one cannot recognize
the original shape of the seed in the shape of the growing smectic nucleus.
Our observations
of the B7bis phase do not relate to the existence of a
classic smectic order. We especially point out that we failed to find
FCD’s, which could be the main signature of the smectic structure. For conventional smectics
the FCD’s can be easily prepared by placing the
material on a glass substrate or on glycerol.
The texture of the B7bis film floating on
glycerol is displayed Fig. 9. Instead of
FCD’s we find numerous DD’s, whereas for the B2
phase of the banana material 12-OPIMB (Fig.1b) we really find a texture
consisting of FCD’s, with a typical Apollonius
packing (Fig. 10) [33,34]. The FCD’s are broken
in a way much similar to those of the smectic C
phase. Another banana material, namely 10-OPIMB-F3, also forms broken FCD’s (Fig.11a) and Grandjean
terraces decorated by FCD’s (Fig. 11b). We also find a Schlieren
texture in this material (Fig.11c), indicating that the main director is
tilted with respect to the smectic layers.
The
B7 phases often built easily either free films, or free strands. One may
assume that the different cases come from different anchoring energy
anisotropies with the isotropic phase, favoring either layer contact with the
isotropic phase (i.e. free films) or ‘columnar’ contact with the isotropic
phase (i.e. free strands). Of course,
the more favored is the ‘column’ contact with the isotropic phase, the more (meta)stable
are the HR’s.
Summarizing, we conclude that the textures for the B7bis
presented in this paper and the B7 reported in [10] are typical
of a helical columnar texture with layers. The textures of helical columnar phases without
layers have been theoretically studied by Kamien and
Nelson [35]; they have not been observed yet, except maybe in [25]. In this later case the textures show a set of
twist boundaries widely separated one from the next. Liquid crystals with a lamello-columnar
structure have been reported in [36,37].
(i)- Helical ribbons. We claim
that the geometry of a S-HR (Slim Helical Ribbon) is that one of a screw
dislocation with a giant Burgers vector, limited to a cylindrical region enclosed
by equal helical disclination lines of strength k =
1/2, see Fig.3a,b. These two disclinations constitute a mode of splitting of the
dislocation, whose Burgers vector is equal to the pitch of the helices. Such a model is not new; it has already been
developed in [38a] (see also [38b], chapter 5), in order to explain the double
helices that had been observed by C. Williams [39] in a thermotropic
SmA cooled from a nematic
phase.
In this model,
the smectic layers take the shape of nested parallel
helicoids. The pitch of the helicoids is the Burgers vector b of the
screw dislocation. The focal surfaces of
this set of surfaces are singular along two helical lines, also of pitch b,
rejected at a finite distance b/2p of the common axis of the helicoids. The helicoids are folded about these lines,
which are precisely the k = 1/2 disclinations,
see the two solid lines in Fig.8, which is plotted using equations given in
[38].
The thin helical lines of the mesh
scribed on each helicoid in Fig.8 can be considered
as a schematic representation of the columns, which are in the direction of the
HR axis; this is in accord with the unidirectional growth. Observe also that in such a model the
modulation suffers a helical twist from a layer to the next.
According
to this model the distance D between two disclination
lines in a HR has to be equal to b/p.
Thus, the ratio p/D is expected to be
equal to p.
We have performed measurements for 26 HR’s. For 16 of them, which are of S type, we find p/D» p.
Note that the middle photograph in Figure 9b from reference [8] as well
as a ribbon in Fiq.6 from reference [28], called by the authors a ‘single
spiral’, also represent a
S-ribbon, in excellent agreement with the model of a giant screw dislocation. For the 10 other ribbons, which are F, this
ratio is smaller than 1. This confirms
the observation according to which F-ribbons are modifications of S-ribbons by
lateral growth, whereas the screw character is preserved.
The good
agreement of the p/D values obtained for S-ribbons confirms the model
according to which they are formed by parallel layers, stacked on the central
ruled helicoid as it is shown in Fig.8.
(ii)- DD
singular point. Such an object is an intriguing example of structural chirality. According
to the model in [29], the columns are lines in 3D space, exhibiting a torsion
of a given sign, either left or right, so that the configuration looks twisted,
although it is not: n.curln = 0,
where n is the columnar director. In a sense, this object shows structural chirality, no structural helicity
(if we assign the concept of helicity to the
pseudo-scalar n.curln,
i.e., torsion. The fact
that this defect has been found only now can be related to the chiral and columnar nature of the B7 phase. Another reason is that according to [29] the
interior of the conical region of the defect occupies quite a large
volume. It is reasonable to expect that
this region (dashed volume in Fig. 5b) can be filled by the isotropic
phase.
The
following remarks stress why the tentative models fit our observations:
(a)- the layers are composed of columns that rotate helically from
one layer to the next . Were the layers
in the HR’s cylindrical (and not helicoidal),
the columns would occupy different geometries in neighboring layers, and the
layer modulation would be generically incommensurate with the perimeter of the
cylinder; this geometry would be energetically very unsatisfactory.
(b)-
consider two HR’s in contact; there is no way that
the directions of possibly merging layers do match, which is an obstacle to
coalescence.
(c)-
size limitation: in the model of [38], the analytical
continuation of the helicoids outside the cylindrical region bound by the disclinations, is of positive Gaussian curvature, G
> 0, while it is of negative Gaussian curvature, G < 0,
outside. We believe that this is an
essential ingredient of the size limitation. Recall that in thermotropic
smectics the FCD’s physical
parts have G < 0, although the Dupin cyclides possess analytical continuations with G
> 0.
(d)-
observe that unidirectional growth is natural for columnar phases: the
probability to attach additional molecules to the column end, i.e. along
the fluid direction is much higher than when doing it from the columns side.
(e) –
the interfaces with the isotropic phase of the nuclei (mostly DDs) obtained on slow cooling are well faceted, indicating
2D positional order, hence visualizing the columnar structure.
Due
to their complex structure, which involves at the same time a smectic layering and a 1D modulation of the layers (we call
columns the elements of this modulation), the B7 and
B7bis phases have remarkable
distinctive features, which are apparent in a careful study of the (similar) textures
that they display under cooling from the isotropic phase.
Fast
quenching from the higher temperature range of the isotropic liquid phase: most fascinating are the
helical ribbons that then appear. These
helical ribbons have a finite width that scales as their pitch; they do not
coalesce in larger ribbons when in contact.
These helical ribbons are screw dislocations with a giant Burgers
vector, split into two helical disclination lines of
strength k = 1/2. The pitch of
the helical ribbons is the Burgers vector b of the screw dislocation.
Measured and predicted values of the p/D ratio are in
agreement. We refer to this state as a metastable state where the columns show helicity from one layer to the next, i.e. a natural
(metastable) pitch to which b is related, most
probably linearly. Such structural
features are not compatible with a compact space packing; they are frustrated.
Slow
cooling: the
samples do not grow helical ribbons, but the defects of the structure are akin
to defects in a columnar liquid crystal, namely developable domains or nuclei
with well faceted crossections, where the columns
show no twist at all. We refer to the
state without helicity as the ground state.
Annealing: If the HR’s
are carefully annealed at a temperature close to the temperature of the
transition, they transform into DD’s looking at first sight as figures of
revolution (which we baptized spindles) or into flat domains in the form of
banana leaf. The discontinous disappearance
of helicity under annealing is a rather unexpected
phenomenon. In the resulting geometry
(DD’s), the columns belonging to neighboring layers are parallel: helicity has disappeared, there is no twist, i.e. n. curln
= 0.
Furthermore the reverse heating never results into the reverse transformation
from spindles to HR’s. Therefore, these spindles are textures of the
ground state.
A
more detailed account of the geometrical model of HR’s,
with a discussion of its energy, will be given in a forthcoming publication.
We are pleased to thank Prof.
Oleg Lavrentovich and Dr. Vladimir Dmitrienko for a critical reading of the manuscript. One of us (MK) acknowledges stimulating
discussions with Dr Françoise Livolant on the
subject of helical and twisted ribbons.
Fig.4. Transformation of HR’s into developable domains (DD), (thick cell, » 1mm): (a) DD’s
are similar to figures of revolution when they do not touch the substrates; (b)
the intermediate stage (transformation of a HR into an opened ribbon); (c)
final stage of the transformation of an opened ribbon into a DD. The schematic representation of these
transformations are shown below the corresponding photographs. Insertion in
figure c): the crossection of a DD has the
configuration of a developable domain.
Fig.11. Liquid crystal textures of the material
3FB10q on a substrate of glycerol at temperatures below the clearing point:
(a)- FCD’s, (b)- Grandjean
terraces decorated by FCD’s, (c)- Schlieren
texture.
[1]. D. Vorlander, A. Apel, Ber. Dtsch.
Chem. Ges., 62, 2831 (1929).
[2]. G. Pelzl, I. Wirth, W. Weissflog,
Liq. Cryst., 28, 969 (2001).
[3]. T. Niori, T. Sekine, J. Watanabe,
T. Furukawa, H. Takezoe, J. Mater. Chem., 6,1231 (1996).
[4]. G. Pelzl, S. Diele, W. Weissflog,
Adv. Mater, 11, 707 (1999).
[5]. D. M. Walba, E. Korblova, R. Shao,
J. M. Maclennan, D. R. Link, M. A. Glaser, N. A. Clark, Science, 288,
2181 (2000).
[6]. T. Sekine, T. Niori, M. Sone, J.
Watanabe, S. W. Choi, Y. Takanishi, H. Takezoe, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys, 36,
6455 (1997)
[7]. J.-P. Bedel, J.-C. Rouillon, J.-P.
Marcerou, M. Laguerre, M.-F. Achard and H. T. Nguyen, Liq. Cryst., 27,
103 (2000).
[8]. J.-P. Bedel, J.-C. Rouillon, J.-P.
Marcerou, M. Laguerre, M.-F. Achard and H. T. Nguyen, Liq. Cryst., 27,
1411 (2000).
[9]. A. Jakli, C. Lischka, W.
Weissflog, G. Pelzl, A. Saupe, Liq. Cryst. 27, 1405 (2000).
[10]. G. Pelzl, S. Diele, A. Jakli, Ch.
Lischka, I. Wirth, W. Weissflog, Liq. Cryst. 26, 135 (1999).
[11]. a) W. Weissflog, H. Nadasi, U.
Dunemann, G. Pelzl, S. Diele, A. Eremin and H. Kresse, J. Mater. Chem., 11,
2748 (2001) ; b) A. Eremin, S. Diele, G. Pelzl, H. Nadasi and W.
Weissflog, Phys. Rev. E67, 021702 (2003).
[12]. J.-C. Rouillon,
J.-P. Marcerou, M. Laguerre, H. T. Nguyen and M.-F. Achard, J. Mater. Chem.,
11, 2946 (2001).
[13].
B. K. Sadashiva, H. N. Shreenivas
Murthy and S. Dhara, Liq. Cryst., 28, 483 (2001).
[14]. J.-P. Bedel,
J.-C. Rouillon, J.-P.Marcerou,
M. Laguerre, H. T. Nguyen and
M.-F. Achard, Liq. Cryst., 28, 1285 (2001).
[15]. J.-P. Bedel,
J.-C. Rouillon, J.-P. Marcerou,
M. Laguerre, H. T. Nguyen and
M.-F. Achard, J. Mater. Chem., 12, 2214 (2002).
[16].
N. A. Clark et al, Boulder Workshop, August 2002, Boulder Banana
Workshop Archive, http://anini.colorado.edu/bananas/
[17]. M. Nakata,
Y. Tanikishi, K. Ishikawa, J. Watanabe, H. Takezoe and N. A. Clark, 9th Intern.
Ferroelectric Liquid Crystal Conf.,
[18]. a)- H. R. Brand, P. E. Cladis
and H. Pleiner, Europhys. Lett., 57,
368 (2002); b)- H. R. Brand, H. Pleiner and P. E. Cladis, Euro. Phys. J., E7, 163 (2002).
[19].
R. Oda,
[20].
M. S. Spector, A. Singh, P. B. Messersmith
and J. M. Schnur, Nanoletters,
1, 375 (2001).
[21].
a)- C. Y. Li, S. Z. D. Cheng, J. J. Ge, F. Bai, J. Z. Zhang, I. K. Mann and F. W. Harris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4558 (1999); b)- C. Y. Li, D. Yan, S. Z. D. Cheng, F Bai, J. J.
Ge, B. H. Calhoun, T. He, L.-C. Chien,
F. W. Harris and B. Lotz, Phys. Rev., B60,
12675 (1999).
[22].
S. Amelinckx, B. Devouard
and A. Baronnet Acta Cryst A52, 850 (1996).
[23].
B. Devouard, A. Baronnet,
G. van Tendeloo and S. Amelinckx,
Eur. J. Miner., 9, 539 (1997).
[24].
H. D. Keith and F. J. Padden, Macromolecules, 29,
7776 (1996).
[25].
A. Leforestier, J. Dubochet,
and F. Livolant, Biophys.
J., 81, 2414 (2001).
[26].
C. K. Lee and L.C. Chien, Liq.
Cryst. 26, 609 (1999).
[27].
G. Heppke,
[28].
[29]. M. Kleman,
J. de Phys., 41, 737 (1980).
[30].
M. Kleman, O. D. Lavrentovich,
Soft Matter Physics: An Introduction, Springer 2003.
[31].
R. Pratibha and N. V. Madhusudana,
[32].
S. L. Arora, P. Palffy-Muhoray,
and R. A. Vora, Liq. Cryst., 5, 133 (1989)
[33]. R. Bideaux,
N. Boccara, G. Sarma, L. de
Sèze, P.-G. de Gennes and
O. Parodi J.
de Phys., 34, 661 (1973).
[34].
C. Blanc and M. Kleman, Phys. Rev., E62, 6739
(2000).
[35]. R. D. Kamien and D. R. Nelson,
Phys. Rev., E53, 650 (1996).
[36].
P. Davidson, A.-M. Levelut, H. Strzelecka,
V. Gionis, J. Phys. Lett., 44,
L-823 (1983).
[37].
R. Richardson, S. A. Ponomarenko, N. I. Boiko and V. P. Shibayev, Liq. Cryst., 26, 101 (1999).
[38].
a)- M. Kleman, J.Phys., 46,
1193 (1985); b)- M. Kleman, Points, Lines and
Walls, Wiley 1983.
[39]. C. E. Williams, Phil. Mag.,
32 313 (1975).
[i]. We
shall specialize the term chirality to
conformations (molecular or structural) with no mirror plane; the term helicity will connote the presence of molecular or
structural twist. It is most
useful in the description of phases made of bent-shape molecules to have these
two concepts at hand.
[ii]. The evidence for two
types of ribbons has been first asserted in [28]; but this publication is
essentially devoted to an investigation of the fractal structure of the
assembly of helical nuclei, not to a detailed study of the transition from one
type of ribbon to another.
[iii]. This fact suggests an analogy with the principles of solid crystal growth techniques that are based on the growth from a seed (top-seeding techniques).
Fig 1
Fig 2
Fig 3
Fig 4 a) b)
Fig 4 c)
Fig5 a)
Fig5 b)
Fig 6
Fig 7
Fig 8
Fig 9
Fig 10
Fig 11