We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.

Computer Science and Game Theory

New submissions

[ total of 11 entries: 1-11 ]
[ showing up to 2000 entries per page: fewer | more ]

New submissions for Fri, 3 Feb 23

[1]  arXiv:2302.00941 [pdf, other]
Title: Robust multi-item auction design using statistical learning: Overcoming uncertainty in bidders' types distributions
Authors: Jiale Han, Xiaowu Dai
Subjects: Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Machine Learning (stat.ML)

This paper presents a novel mechanism design for multi-item auction settings with uncertain bidders' type distributions. Our proposed approach utilizes nonparametric density estimation to accurately estimate bidders' types from historical bids, and is built upon the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) mechanism, ensuring satisfaction of Bayesian incentive compatibility (BIC) and $\delta$-individual rationality (IR). To further enhance the efficiency of our mechanism, we introduce two novel strategies for query reduction: a filtering method that screens potential winners' value regions within the confidence intervals generated by our estimated distribution, and a classification strategy that designates the lower bound of an interval as the estimated type when the length is below a threshold value. Simulation experiments conducted on both small-scale and large-scale data demonstrate that our mechanism consistently outperforms existing methods in terms of revenue maximization and query reduction, particularly in large-scale scenarios. This makes our proposed mechanism a highly desirable and effective option for sellers in the realm of multi-item auctions.

[2]  arXiv:2302.01073 [pdf, ps, other]
Title: Learning in Multi-Memory Games Triggers Complex Dynamics Diverging from Nash Equilibrium
Comments: 12 pages (main), 4 figures (main), 6 pages (appendix)
Subjects: Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA); Optimization and Control (math.OC); Chaotic Dynamics (nlin.CD)

Repeated games consider a situation where multiple agents are motivated by their independent rewards throughout learning. In general, the dynamics of their learning become complex. Especially when their rewards compete with each other like zero-sum games, the dynamics often do not converge to their optimum, i.e., Nash equilibrium. To tackle such complexity, many studies have understood various learning algorithms as dynamical systems and discovered qualitative insights among the algorithms. However, such studies have yet to handle multi-memory games (where agents can memorize actions they played in the past and choose their actions based on their memories), even though memorization plays a pivotal role in artificial intelligence and interpersonal relationship. This study extends two major learning algorithms in games, i.e., replicator dynamics and gradient ascent, into multi-memory games. Then, we prove their dynamics are identical. Furthermore, theoretically and experimentally, we clarify that the learning dynamics diverge from the Nash equilibrium in multi-memory zero-sum games and reach heteroclinic cycles (sojourn longer around the boundary of the strategy space), providing a fundamental advance in learning in games.

[3]  arXiv:2302.01203 [pdf, ps, other]
Title: Online Bidding in Repeated Non-Truthful Auctions under Budget and ROI Constraints
Subjects: Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Online advertising platforms typically use auction mechanisms to allocate ad placements. Advertisers participate in a series of repeated auctions, and must select bids that will maximize their overall rewards while adhering to certain constraints. We focus on the scenario in which the advertiser has budget and return-on-investment (ROI) constraints. We investigate the problem of budget- and ROI-constrained bidding in repeated non-truthful auctions, such as first-price auctions, and present a best-of-both-worlds framework with no-regret guarantees under both stochastic and adversarial inputs. By utilizing the notion of interval regret, we demonstrate that our framework does not require knowledge of specific parameters of the problem which could be difficult to determine in practice. Our proof techniques can be applied to both the adversarial and stochastic cases with minimal modifications, thereby providing a unified perspective on the two problems. In the adversarial setting, we also show that it is possible to loosen the traditional requirement of having a strictly feasible solution to the offline optimization problem at each round.

Cross-lists for Fri, 3 Feb 23

[4]  arXiv:2302.00736 (cross-list from cs.LG) [pdf, ps, other]
Title: Approximating the Shapley Value without Marginal Contributions
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT)

The Shapley value is arguably the most popular approach for assigning a meaningful contribution value to players in a cooperative game, which has recently been used intensively in various areas of machine learning, most notably in explainable artificial intelligence. The meaningfulness is due to axiomatic properties that only the Shapley value satisfies, which, however, comes at the expense of an exact computation growing exponentially with the number of agents. Accordingly, a number of works are devoted to the efficient approximation of the Shapley values, all of which revolve around the notion of an agent's marginal contribution. In this paper, we propose with SVARM and Stratified SVARM two parameter-free and domain-independent approximation algorithms based on a representation of the Shapley value detached from the notion of marginal contributions. We prove unmatched theoretical guarantees regarding their approximation quality and provide satisfying empirical results.

[5]  arXiv:2302.00797 (cross-list from cs.AI) [pdf, other]
Title: Combining Tree-Search, Generative Models, and Nash Bargaining Concepts in Game-Theoretic Reinforcement Learning
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)

Multiagent reinforcement learning (MARL) has benefited significantly from population-based and game-theoretic training regimes. One approach, Policy-Space Response Oracles (PSRO), employs standard reinforcement learning to compute response policies via approximate best responses and combines them via meta-strategy selection. We augment PSRO by adding a novel search procedure with generative sampling of world states, and introduce two new meta-strategy solvers based on the Nash bargaining solution. We evaluate PSRO's ability to compute approximate Nash equilibrium, and its performance in two negotiation games: Colored Trails, and Deal or No Deal. We conduct behavioral studies where human participants negotiate with our agents ($N = 346$). We find that search with generative modeling finds stronger policies during both training time and test time, enables online Bayesian co-player prediction, and can produce agents that achieve comparable social welfare negotiating with humans as humans trading among themselves.

[6]  arXiv:2302.01116 (cross-list from econ.TH) [pdf, other]
Title: Signaling Games with Costly Monitoring
Authors: Reuben Bearman
Comments: 19 pages, 6 figures
Subjects: Theoretical Economics (econ.TH); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT)

If in a signaling game the receiver expects to gain no information by monitoring the signal of the sender, then when a cost to monitor is implemented he will never pay that cost regardless of his off-path beliefs. This is the argument of a recent paper by T. Denti (2021). However, which pooling equilibrium does a receiver anticipate to gain no information through monitoring? This paper seeks to prove that given a sufficiently small cost to monitor any pooling equilibrium with a non-zero index will survive close to the original equilibrium.

[7]  arXiv:2302.01177 (cross-list from cs.CR) [pdf, other]
Title: Order but Not Execute in Order
Comments: 12 pages, 1 figure
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT)

We explore combining batch order-fair atomic broadcast (of-ABC) and frequent batch auction (FBA) as a defense against general order manipulations in blockchain-based decentralized exchanges (DEX). To justify FBA, we compare the welfare loss of decentralized exchanges under two market designs: continuous limit order book (CLOB), where transactions are processed sequentially, and FBA, where transactions are arranged into batches and a uniform price double auction decides execution order. We model three types of players, common investors, privately informed traders, and arbitrageurs who can provide liquidity and front-run, along with a decentralized exchange. Assuming that the exchange is realized over an of-ABC protocol, we find that FBA can achieve better social welfare compared to CLOB when (1) public information affecting the fundamental value of an asset is revealed more frequently, and/or (2) the block generation interval is sufficiently large, and/or (3) the priority fees are small compared to the asset price changes, and/or (4) fewer privately informed parties exist. Intrinsic reasons are that first, blockchains already treat time as discrete and ensuring order fairness there is non-trivial, allowing even more room for latency arbitrage rents under CLOB; second, sufficiently large block creation interval allows for information dispersion; third, higher priority fees discourage front-running under CLOB; additionally, FBA prioritizes price in deciding execution order and fewer informed traders mean less adverse price impact.

Replacements for Fri, 3 Feb 23

[8]  arXiv:2107.06312 (replaced) [pdf, ps, other]
Title: Convergence and Correlation in Large Games
Comments: 24 pages
Subjects: Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Theoretical Economics (econ.TH)
[9]  arXiv:2204.12723 (replaced) [pdf, ps, other]
Title: Information-theoretic limitations of data-based price discrimination
Comments: In the new version, we have (1) added a simulation and empirical study and (2) fixed some minor issues and improved the clarity
Subjects: Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Information Theory (cs.IT); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Econometrics (econ.EM); Theoretical Economics (econ.TH)
[10]  arXiv:2211.14016 (replaced) [pdf, ps, other]
Title: Strategic Facility Location with Clients that Minimize Total Waiting Time
Comments: To appear at the 37th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-23), full version
Subjects: Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
[11]  arXiv:2302.00608 (replaced) [pdf, other]
Title: The Investment Management Game: Extending the Scope of the Notion of Core
Comments: 13 pages. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2209.04903
Subjects: Theoretical Economics (econ.TH); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT)
[ total of 11 entries: 1-11 ]
[ showing up to 2000 entries per page: fewer | more ]

Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Links to: arXiv, form interface, find, cs, recent, 2302, contact, help  (Access key information)