# Theoretical Economics

## New submissions

[ total of 3 entries: 1-3 ]
[ showing up to 2000 entries per page: fewer | more ]

### New submissions for Thu, 9 Dec 21

[1]
Title: Aggregation of Pareto optimal models
Subjects: Theoretical Economics (econ.TH); Statistics Theory (math.ST)

In statistical decision theory, a model is said to be Pareto optimal (or admissible) if no other model carries less risk for at least one state of nature while presenting no more risk for others. How can you rationally aggregate/combine a finite set of Pareto optimal models while preserving Pareto efficiency? This question is nontrivial because weighted model averaging does not, in general, preserve Pareto efficiency. This paper presents an answer in four logical steps: (1) A rational aggregation rule should preserve Pareto efficiency (2) Due to the complete class theorem, Pareto optimal models must be Bayesian, i.e., they minimize a risk where the true state of nature is averaged with respect to some prior. Therefore each Pareto optimal model can be associated with a prior, and Pareto efficiency can be maintained by aggregating Pareto optimal models through their priors. (3) A prior can be interpreted as a preference ranking over models: prior $\pi$ prefers model A over model B if the average risk of A is lower than the average risk of B. (4) A rational/consistent aggregation rule should preserve this preference ranking: If both priors $\pi$ and $\pi'$ prefer model A over model B, then the prior obtained by aggregating $\pi$ and $\pi'$ must also prefer A over B. Under these four steps, we show that all rational/consistent aggregation rules are as follows: Give each individual Pareto optimal model a weight, introduce a weak order/ranking over the set of Pareto optimal models, aggregate a finite set of models S as the model associated with the prior obtained as the weighted average of the priors of the highest-ranked models in S. This result shows that all rational/consistent aggregation rules must follow a generalization of hierarchical Bayesian modeling. Following our main result, we present applications to Kernel smoothing, time-depreciating models, and voting mechanisms.

### Cross-lists for Thu, 9 Dec 21

[2]  arXiv:2112.04166 (cross-list from cs.GT) [pdf, ps, other]
Title: Weighted Fairness Notions for Indivisible Items Revisited
Comments: Appears in the 36th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 2022
Subjects: Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Theoretical Economics (econ.TH)

We revisit the setting of fairly allocating indivisible items when agents have different weights representing their entitlements. First, we propose a parameterized family of relaxations for weighted envy-freeness and the same for weighted proportionality; the parameters indicate whether smaller-weight or larger-weight agents should be given a higher priority. We show that each notion in these families can always be satisfied, but any two cannot necessarily be fulfilled simultaneously. We then introduce an intuitive weighted generalization of maximin share fairness and establish the optimal approximation of it that can be guaranteed. Furthermore, we characterize the implication relations between the various weighted fairness notions introduced in this and prior work, and relate them to the lower and upper quota axioms from apportionment.

[3]  arXiv:2112.04310 (cross-list from cs.CR) [pdf, other]
Title: Cyber-Security Investment in the Context of Disruptive Technologies: Extension of the Gordon-Loeb Model