Theoretical Economics
New submissions
[ showing up to 2000 entries per page: fewer  more ]
New submissions for Thu, 9 Dec 21
 [1] arXiv:2112.04161 [pdf, ps, other]

Title: Aggregation of Pareto optimal modelsSubjects: Theoretical Economics (econ.TH); Statistics Theory (math.ST)
In statistical decision theory, a model is said to be Pareto optimal (or admissible) if no other model carries less risk for at least one state of nature while presenting no more risk for others. How can you rationally aggregate/combine a finite set of Pareto optimal models while preserving Pareto efficiency? This question is nontrivial because weighted model averaging does not, in general, preserve Pareto efficiency. This paper presents an answer in four logical steps: (1) A rational aggregation rule should preserve Pareto efficiency (2) Due to the complete class theorem, Pareto optimal models must be Bayesian, i.e., they minimize a risk where the true state of nature is averaged with respect to some prior. Therefore each Pareto optimal model can be associated with a prior, and Pareto efficiency can be maintained by aggregating Pareto optimal models through their priors. (3) A prior can be interpreted as a preference ranking over models: prior $\pi$ prefers model A over model B if the average risk of A is lower than the average risk of B. (4) A rational/consistent aggregation rule should preserve this preference ranking: If both priors $\pi$ and $\pi'$ prefer model A over model B, then the prior obtained by aggregating $\pi$ and $\pi'$ must also prefer A over B. Under these four steps, we show that all rational/consistent aggregation rules are as follows: Give each individual Pareto optimal model a weight, introduce a weak order/ranking over the set of Pareto optimal models, aggregate a finite set of models S as the model associated with the prior obtained as the weighted average of the priors of the highestranked models in S. This result shows that all rational/consistent aggregation rules must follow a generalization of hierarchical Bayesian modeling. Following our main result, we present applications to Kernel smoothing, timedepreciating models, and voting mechanisms.
Crosslists for Thu, 9 Dec 21
 [2] arXiv:2112.04166 (crosslist from cs.GT) [pdf, ps, other]

Title: Weighted Fairness Notions for Indivisible Items RevisitedComments: Appears in the 36th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 2022Subjects: Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Theoretical Economics (econ.TH)
We revisit the setting of fairly allocating indivisible items when agents have different weights representing their entitlements. First, we propose a parameterized family of relaxations for weighted envyfreeness and the same for weighted proportionality; the parameters indicate whether smallerweight or largerweight agents should be given a higher priority. We show that each notion in these families can always be satisfied, but any two cannot necessarily be fulfilled simultaneously. We then introduce an intuitive weighted generalization of maximin share fairness and establish the optimal approximation of it that can be guaranteed. Furthermore, we characterize the implication relations between the various weighted fairness notions introduced in this and prior work, and relate them to the lower and upper quota axioms from apportionment.
 [3] arXiv:2112.04310 (crosslist from cs.CR) [pdf, other]

Title: CyberSecurity Investment in the Context of Disruptive Technologies: Extension of the GordonLoeb ModelComments: 18 pages, 3 figuresSubjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Theoretical Economics (econ.TH)
Cybersecurity breaches inflict significant costs on organizations. Hence, the development of an informationsystems defense capability through cybersecurity investment is a prerequisite. The question of how to determine the optimal amount to invest in cybersecurity has been widely investigated in the literature. In this respect, the GordonLoeb model and its extensions received widescale acceptance. However, such models predominantly rely on restrictive assumptions that are not adapted for analyzing dynamic aspects of cybersecurity investment. Yet, understanding such dynamic aspects is a key feature for studying cybersecurity investment in the context of a fastpaced and continuously evolving technological landscape. We propose an extension of the GordonLoeb model by considering multiperiod and relaxing the assumption of a continuous securitybreach probability function. Such theoretical adaptations enable to capture dynamic aspects of cybersecurity investment such as the advent of a disruptive technology and its investment consequences. Such a proposed extension of the GordonLoeb model gives room for a hypothetical decrease of the optimal level of cybersecurity investment, due to a potential technological shift. While we believe our framework should be generalizable across the cybersecurity milieu, we illustrate our approach in the context of criticalinfrastructure protection, where securitycost reductions related to risk events are of paramount importance as potential losses reach unaffordable proportions. Moreover, despite the fact that some technologies are considered as disruptive and thus promising for criticalinfrastructure protection, their effects on cybersecurity investment have been discussed little.
[ showing up to 2000 entries per page: fewer  more ]
Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
Links to: arXiv, form interface, find, econ, recent, 2112, contact, help (Access key information)