Theoretical Economics

New submissions

• New submissions
• Cross-lists
• Replacements

New submissions for Tue, 11 Aug 20

[1]  arXiv:2008.04229 [pdf, ps, other]

Title: The Decision-Conflict and Multicriteria Logit

Authors: Georgios Gerasimou

Subjects: Theoretical Economics (econ.TH); Econometrics (econ.EM)

We study two random non-forced choice models that explain behavioural patterns suggesting that the no-choice outside option is often selected when people find it hard to decide between the market alternatives available to them, even when these are few and desirable. The decision-conflict logit extends the logit model with an outside option by assigning a menu-dependent value to that option. This value captures the degree of complexity/decision difficulty at the relevant menu and allows for the choice probability of the outside option to either increase or decrease when the menu is expanded, depending on how many as well as on how attractive options are added to it. The multicriteria logit is a special case of this model and introduces multiple utility functions that jointly predict behaviour in a multiplicative-logit way. Every multicriteria logit admits a tractable discrete-choice formulation.

[2]  arXiv:2008.04256 [pdf, ps, other]

Title: Purely Bayesian counterfactuals versus Newcomb's paradox

Authors: Lê Nguyên Hoang

Subjects: Theoretical Economics (econ.TH); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

This paper proposes a careful separation between an entity's epistemic system and their decision system. Crucially, Bayesian counterfactuals are estimated by the epistemic system; not by the decision system. Based on this remark, I prove the existence of Newcomb-like problems for which an epistemic system necessarily expects the entity to make a counterfactually bad decision. I then address (a slight generalization of) Newcomb's paradox. I solve the specific case where the player believes that the predictor applies Bayes rule with a supset of all the data available to the player. I prove that the counterfactual optimality of the 1-Box strategy depends on the player's prior on the predictor's additional data. If these additional data are not expected to reduce sufficiently the predictor's uncertainty on the player's decision, then the player's epistemic system will counterfactually prefer to 2-Box. But if the predictor's data is believed to make them quasi-omniscient, then 1-Box will be counterfactually preferred. Implications of the analysis are then discussed. More generally, I argue that, to better understand or design an entity, it is useful to clearly separate the entity's epistemic, decision, but also data collection, reward and maintenance systems, whether the entity is human, algorithmic or institutional.

Cross-lists for Tue, 11 Aug 20

[3]  arXiv:2008.03500 (cross-list from math.PR) [pdf, ps, other]

Title: Radner equilibrium and systems of quadratic BSDEs with discontinuous generators

Authors: Luis Escauriaza, Daniel C. Schwarz, Hao Xing

Comments: 42 pages

Subjects: Probability (math.PR); Theoretical Economics (econ.TH); Mathematical Finance (q-fin.MF)

Motivated by an equilibrium problem, we establish the existence of a solution for a family of Markovian backward stochastic differential equations with quadratic nonlinearity and discontinuity in $Z$. Using unique continuation and backward uniqueness, we show that the set of discontinuity has measure zero. In a continuous-time stochastic model of an endowment economy, we prove the existence of an incomplete Radner equilibrium with nondegenerate endogenous volatility.

Replacements for Tue, 11 Aug 20

[4]  arXiv:1807.10895 (replaced) [pdf, other]

Title: Exceeding Expectations: Stochastic Dominance as a General Decision Theory

Authors: Christian Tarsney

Subjects: Theoretical Economics (econ.TH)

• New submissions
• Cross-lists
• Replacements