High Energy Physics  Experiment
New submissions
[ showing up to 2000 entries per page: fewer  more ]
New submissions for Mon, 30 Mar 20
 [1] arXiv:2003.12136 [pdf, other]

Title: Results on Total and Elastic Cross Sections in ProtonProton Collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 200$ GeVAuthors: STAR Collaboration: J. Adam, L. Adamczyk, J. R. Adams, J. K. Adkins, G. Agakishiev, M. M. Aggarwal, Z. Ahammed, I. Alekseev, D. M. Anderson, A. Aparin, E. C. Aschenauer, M. U. Ashraf, F. G. Atetalla, A. Attri, G. S. Averichev, V. Bairathi, K. Barish, A. Behera, R. Bellwied, A. Bhasin, J. Bielcik, J. Bielcikova, L. C. Bland, I. G. Bordyuzhin, J. D. Brandenburg, A. V. Brandin, S. Bueltmann, J. Butterworth, H. Caines, M. Calderón de la Barca Sánchez, D. Cebra, I. Chakaberia, P. Chaloupka, B. K. Chan, FH. Chang, Z. Chang, N. ChankovaBunzarova, A. Chatterjee, D. Chen, J. H. Chen, X. Chen, Z. Chen, J. Cheng, M. Cherney, M. Chevalier, S. Choudhury, W. Christie, H. J. Crawford, M. Csanád, M. Daugherity, T. G. Dedovich, I. M. Deppner, A. A. Derevschikov, L. Didenko, X. Dong, J. L. Drachenberg, et al. (305 additional authors not shown)Comments: 12 pages, 7 figuresSubjects: High Energy Physics  Experiment (hepex); Nuclear Experiment (nuclex)
We report results on the total and elastic cross sections in protonproton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=200$ GeV obtained with the Roman Pot setup of the STAR experiment at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC). The elastic differential cross section was measured in the squared fourmomentum transfer range $0.045 \leq t \leq 0.135$ GeV$^2$. The value of the exponential slope parameter $B$ of the elastic differential cross section $d\sigma/dt \sim e^{Bt}$ in the measured $t$ range was found to be $B = 14.32 \pm 0.09 (stat.)^{\scriptstyle +0.13}_{\scriptstyle 0.28} (syst.)$ GeV$^{2}$. The total cross section $\sigma_{tot}$, obtained from extrapolation of the $d\sigma/dt$ to the optical point at $t = 0$, is $\sigma_{tot} = 54.67 \pm 0.21 (stat.) ^{\scriptstyle +1.28}_{\scriptstyle 1.38} (syst.)$ mb. We also present the values of the elastic cross section $\sigma_{el} = 10.85 \pm 0.03 (stat.) ^{\scriptstyle +0.49}_{\scriptstyle 0.41}(syst.)$ mb, the elastic cross section integrated within the STAR $t$range $\sigma^{det}_{el} = 4.05 \pm 0.01 (stat.) ^{\scriptstyle+0.18}_{\scriptstyle 0.17}(syst.)$ mb, and the inelastic cross section $\sigma_{inel} = 43.82 \pm 0.21 (stat.) ^{\scriptstyle +1.37}_{\scriptstyle 1.44} (syst.)$ mb. The results are compared with the world data.
 [2] arXiv:2003.12220 [pdf, ps, other]

Title: First Observation of $D^+\to ημ^+ν_μ$ and Measurement of its Decay DynamicsAuthors: BESIII Collaboration (M.Ablikim, M.N.Achasov, P.Adlarson, S. Ahmed, M.Albrecht, A.Amoroso, Q.An, Anita, Y.Bai, O.Bakina, R.Baldini Ferroli, I.Balossino, Y.Ban, K.Begzsuren, J.V.Bennett, N.Berger, M.Bertani, D.Bettoni, F.Bianchi, JBiernat, J.Bloms, A.Bortone, I.Boyko, R.A.Briere, H.Cai, X.Cai, A.Calcaterra, G.F.Cao, N.Cao, S.A.Cetin, J.F.Chang, W.L.Chang, G.Chelkov, D.Y.Chen, G.Chen, H.S.Chen, M.L.Chen, S.J.Chen, X.R.Chen, Y.B.Chen, W.Cheng, G.Cibinetto, F.Cossio, X.F.Cui, H.L.Dai, J.P.Dai, X.C.Dai, A.Dbeyssi, R. B.de Boer, D.Dedovich, Z.Y.Deng, A.Denig, I.Denysenko, M.Destefanis, F.DeMori, Y.Ding, C.Dong, J.Dong, L.Y.Dong, M.Y.Dong, S.X.Du, J.Fang, S.S.Fang, Y.Fang, R.Farinelli, L.Fava, F.Feldbauer, G.Felici, C.Q.Feng, M.Fritsch, C.D.Fu, Y.Fu, X.L.Gao, Y.Gao, Y.Gao, Y.G.Gao, I.Garzia, E.M.Gersabeck, A.Gilman, K.Goetzen, L.Gong, W.X.Gong, W.Gradl, M.Greco, L.M.Gu, M.H.Gu, S.Gu, Y.T.Gu, C.YGuan, A.Q.Guo, L.B.Guo, R.P.Guo, Y.P.Guo, Y.P.Guo, A.Guskov, S.Han, T.T.Han, T.Z.Han, X.Q.Hao, F.A.Harris, K.L.He, F.H.Heinsius, T.Held, Y.K.Heng, M.Himmelreich, T.Holtmann, Y.R.Hou, Z.L.Hou, H.M.Hu, J.F.Hu, T.Hu, Y.Hu, G.S.Huang, L.Q.Huang, X.T.Huang, Z.Huang, N.Huesken, T.Hussain, W.Ikegami Andersson, W.Imoehl, M.Irshad, S.Jaeger, S.Janchiv, Q.Ji, Q.P.Ji, X.B.Ji, X.L.Ji, H.B.Jiang, X.S.Jiang, X.Y.Jiang, J.B.Jiao, Z.Jiao, S.Jin, Y.Jin, T.Johansson, N.KalantarNayestanaki, X.S.Kang, R.Kappert, M.Kavatsyuk, B.C.Ke, I.K.Keshk, A.Khoukaz, P. Kiese, R.Kiuchi, R.Kliemt, L.Koch, O.B.Kolcu, B.Kopf, M.Kuemmel, M.Kuessner, A.Kupsc, M. G.Kurth, W.Kühn, J.J.Lane, J.S.Lange, P. Larin, L.Lavezzi, H.Leithoff, M.Lellmann, T.Lenz, C.Li, C.H.Li, ChengLi, D.M.Li, F.Li, G.Li, H.B.Li, H.J.Li, J.L.Li, J.Q.Li, KeLi, L.K.Li, LeiLi, P.L.Li, P.R.Li, S.Y.Li, W.D.Li, W.G.Li, X.H.Li, X.L.Li, Z.B.Li, Z.Y.Li, H.Liang, H.Liang, Y.F.Liang, Y.T.Liang, L.Z.Liao, J.Libby, C.X.Lin, B.Liu, B.J.Liu, C.X.Liu, D.Liu, D.Y.Liu, F.H.Liu, FangLiu, FengLiu, H.B.Liu, H.M.Liu, HuanhuanLiu, HuihuiLiu, J.B.Liu, J.Y.Liu, K.Liu, K.Y.Liu, KeLiu, L.Liu, Q.Liu, S.B.Liu, T.Liu, X.Liu, Y.B.Liu, Z.A.Liu, Z.Q.Liu, Y. F.Long, X.C.Lou, H.J.Lu, J.D.Lu, J.G.Lu, X.L.Lu, Y.Lu, Y.P.Lu, C.L.Luo, M.X.Luo, P.W.Luo, T.Luo, X.L.Luo, S.Lusso, X.R.Lyu, F.C.Ma, H.L.Ma, L.L. Ma, M.M.Ma, Q.M.Ma, R.Q.Ma, R.T.Ma, X.N.Ma, X.X.Ma, X.Y.Ma, Y.M.Ma, F.E.Maas, M.Maggiora, S.Maldaner, S.Malde, Q.A.Malik, A.Mangoni, Y.J.Mao, Z.P.Mao, S.Marcello, Z.X.Meng, J.G.Messchendorp, G.Mezzadri, T.J.Min, R.E.Mitchell, X.H.Mo, Y.J.Mo, N.Yu.Muchnoi, H.Muramatsu, S.Nakhoul, Y.Nefedov, F.Nerling, I.B.Nikolaev, Z.Ning, S.Nisar, S.L.Olsen, Q.Ouyang, S.Pacetti, Y.Pan, A.Pathak, P.Patteri, M.Pelizaeus, H.P.Peng, K.Peters, J.Pettersson, J.L.Ping, R.G.Ping, A.Pitka, R.Poling, V.Prasad, H.Qi, H.R.Qi, M.Qi, T.Y.Qi, S.Qian, W.B.Qian, Z.Qian, C.F.Qiao, L.Q.Qin, X.P.Qin, X.S.Qin, Z.H.Qin, J.F.Qiu, S.Q.Qu, K.H.Rashid, K.Ravindran, C.F.Redmer, A.Rivetti, V.Rodin, M.Rolo, G.Rong, Ch.Rosner, M.Rump, A.Sarantsev, M.Savrié, Y.Schelhaas, C.Schnier, K.Schoenning, W.Shan, X.Y.Shan, M.Shao, C.P.Shen, P.X.Shen, X.Y.Shen, H.C.Shi, R.S.Shi, X.Shi, X.DShi, J.J.Song, Q.Q.Song, Y.X.Song, S.Sosio, S.Spataro, F.F. Sui, G.X.Sun, J.F.Sun, L.Sun, S.S.Sun, T.Sun, W.Y.Sun, Y.J.Sun, Y.KSun, Y.Z.Sun, Z.T.Sun, Y.H.Tan, Y.X.Tan, C.J.Tang, G.Y.Tang, J.Tang, V.Thoren, B.Tsednee, I.Uman, B.Wang, B.L.Wang, C.W.Wang, D.Y.Wang, H.P.Wang, K.Wang, L.L.Wang, M.Wang, M.Z.Wang, MengWang, W.H.Wang, W.P.Wang, X.Wang, X.F.Wang, X.L.Wang, Y.Wang, Y.Wang, Y.D.Wang, Y.F.Wang, Y.Q.Wang, Z.Wang, Z.Y.Wang, ZiyiWang, ZongyuanWang, T.Weber, D.H.Wei, P.Weidenkaff, F.Weidner, S.P.Wen, D.J.White, U.Wiedner, G.Wilkinson, M.Wolke, L.Wollenberg, J.F.Wu, L.H.Wu, L.J.Wu, X.Wu, Z.Wu, L.Xia, H.Xiao, S.Y.Xiao, Y.J.Xiao, Z.J.Xiao, X.H.Xie, Y.G.Xie, Y.H.Xie, T.Y.Xing, X.A.Xiong, G.F.Xu, J.J.Xu, Q.J.Xu, W.Xu, X.P.Xu, L.Yan, L.Yan, W.B.Yan, W.C.Yan, H.J.Yang, H.X.Yang, L.Yang, R.X.Yang, S.L.Yang, Y.H.Yang, Y.X.Yang, YifanYang, ZhiYang, M.Ye, M.H.Ye, J.H.Yin, Z.Y.You, B.X.Yu, C.X.Yu, G.Yu, J.S.Yu, T.Yu, C.Z.Yuan, W.Yuan, X.Q.Yuan, Y.Yuan, Z.Y.Yuan, C.X.Yue, A.Yuncu, A.A.Zafar, Y.Zeng, B.X.Zhang, GuangyiZhang, H.H.Zhang, H.Y.Zhang, J.L.Zhang, J.Q.Zhang, J.W.Zhang, J.Y.Zhang, J.Z.Zhang, JianyuZhang, JiaweiZhang, L.Zhang, LeiZhang, S.Zhang, S.F.Zhang, T.J.Zhang, X.Y.Zhang, Y.Zhang, Y.H.Zhang, Y.T.Zhang, YanZhang, YaoZhang, YiZhang, Z.H.Zhang, Z.Y.Zhang, G.Zhao, J.Zhao, J.Y.Zhao, J.Z.Zhao, LeiZhao, LingZhao, M.G.Zhao, Q.Zhao, S.J.Zhao, Y.B.Zhao, Y.X.ZhaoZhao, Z.G.Zhao, A.Zhemchugov, B.Zheng, J.P.Zheng, Y.Zheng, Y.H.Zheng, B.Zhong, C.Zhong, L.P.Zhou, Q.Zhou, X.Zhou, X.K.Zhou, X.R.Zhou, A.N.Zhu, J.Zhu, K.Zhu, K.J.Zhu, S.H.Zhu, W.J.Zhu, X.L.Zhu, Y.C.Zhu, Z.A.Zhu, B.S.Zou, J.H.Zou)Comments: 9 pages, 3 figuresSubjects: High Energy Physics  Experiment (hepex)
By analyzing a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $2.93~\mathrm{fb}^{1}$ collected at a centerofmass energy of 3.773 GeV with the BESIII detector, we measure for the first time the absolute branching fraction of the $D^+\to \eta \mu^+\nu_\mu$ decay to be ${\mathcal B}_{D^+\to \eta \mu^+\nu_\mu}=(10.4\pm1.0_{\rm stat}\pm0.5_{\rm syst})\times 10^{4}$. Using the world averaged value of ${\mathcal B}_{D^+\to \eta e^+\nu_e}$, the ratio of the two branching fractions is determined to be ${\mathcal B}_{D^+\to \eta \mu^+\nu_\mu}/{\mathcal B}_{D^+\to \eta e^+\nu_e}=0.91\pm0.13$, which agrees with the theoretical expectation of lepton flavor universality within uncertainty. Here, the uncertainty is the sum in quadrature of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. By studying the differential decay rates in five fourmomentum transfer intervals, we obtain the product of the hadronic form factor $f^{\eta}_{+}(0)$ and the $c\to d$ CabibboKobayashiMaskawa matrix element $V_{cd}$ to be $f_{+}^\eta (0)V_{cd}=0.087\pm0.008_{\rm stat}\pm0.002_{\rm syst}$. Taking the input of $V_{cd}$ from the global fit in the standard model, we determine $f_{+}^\eta (0)=0.39\pm0.04_{\rm stat}\pm0.01_{\rm syst}$. On the other hand, using the value of $f_+^{\eta}(0)$ calculated in theory, we find $V_{cd}=0.242\pm0.022_{\rm stat}\pm0.006_{\rm syst}\pm0.033_{\rm theory}$.
Crosslists for Mon, 30 Mar 20
 [3] arXiv:2003.12077 (crosslist from hepph) [pdf, other]

Title: Plasmon production from dark matter scatteringComments: 10 pagesSubjects: High Energy Physics  Phenomenology (hepph); Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astroph.CO); High Energy Physics  Experiment (hepex)
We present a first calculation of the rate for plasmon production in semiconductors from nuclei recoiling against dark matter. The process is analogous to bremsstrahlung of transverse photon modes, but with a longitudinal plasmon mode emitted instead. For dark matter in the 10 MeV  1 GeV mass range, we find that the plasmon bremsstrahlung rate is 45 orders of magnitude smaller than that for elastic scattering, but 45 orders of magnitude larger than the transverse bremsstrahlung rate. Because the plasmon can decay into electronic excitations and has characteristic energy given by the plasma frequency $\omega_p$, with $\omega_p \approx 16$ eV in Si crystals, plasmon production provides a distinctive signature and new method to detect nuclear recoils from subGeV dark matter.
 [4] arXiv:2003.12086 (crosslist from heplat) [pdf, other]

Title: Ratios of the hadronic contributions to the lepton $g2$ from Lattice QCD+QED simulationsComments: 28 pages, 4 figures, 3 tablesSubjects: High Energy Physics  Lattice (heplat); High Energy Physics  Experiment (hepex); High Energy Physics  Phenomenology (hepph); Atomic Physics (physics.atomph)
The ratios among the leadingorder (LO) hadronic vacuum polarization (HVP) contributions to the anomalous magnetic moments of electron, muon and taulepton, $a_{\ell = e, \mu, \tau}^{ HVP, LO}$, are computed using lattice QCD+QED simulations. The results include the effects at order $O(\alpha_{em}^2)$ as well as the electromagnetic and strong isospinbreaking corrections at orders $O(\alpha_{em}^3)$ and $O(\alpha_{em}^2 (m_u  m_d))$, respectively, where $(m_u  m_d)$ is the u and dquark mass difference. We employ the gauge configurations generated by the Extended Twisted Mass Collaboration with $N_f = 2+1+1$ dynamical quarks at three values of the lattice spacing ($a \simeq 0.062, 0.082, 0.089$ fm) with pion masses in the range 210  450 MeV. We show that in the case of the electronmuon ratio the hadronic uncertainties in the numerator and in the denominator largely cancel out, while in the cases of the electrontau and muontau ratios such a cancellation does not occur. For the electronmuon ratio we get $R_{e / \mu } \equiv (m_\mu / m_e)^2 (a_e^{HVP, LO} / a_\mu^{HVP, LO}) = 1.1478~(70)$ with an uncertainty of ~ 0.6 %. Our result, which represents an accurate Standard Model (SM) prediction, agrees very well with the estimate obtained using the results of dispersive analyses of the experimental $e^+ e^ \to$ hadrons data. Instead, it differs by ~ 2.7 standard deviations from the value expected from present electron and muon ($g  2$) experiments after subtraction of the current estimates of the QED, electroweak, hadronic lightbylight and higherorder HVP contributions, namely $R_{e / \mu} = 0.575~(213)$. An improvement of the precision of both the experiment and the QED contribution to the electron ($g  2$) by a factor of $\simeq 2$ could be sufficient to reach a tension with the SM value of the ratio $R_{e / \mu }$ at a significance level of ~ 5 standard deviations.
 [5] arXiv:2003.12226 (crosslist from hepph) [pdf, ps, other]

Title: Study of $B_s\to K^{(*)}\ell^+ \ell^$ decays in the PQCD factorization approach with the lattice QCD inputComments: 38 pages, 13 tables and 8 figuresSubjects: High Energy Physics  Phenomenology (hepph); High Energy Physics  Experiment (hepex); High Energy Physics  Lattice (heplat)
In this paper, we studied the semileptonic decays $B_s \to K^{(*)} \ell^+ \ell^$ with $l^=(e^,\mu^,\tau^)$ by using the perturbative QCD (PQCD) and the "PQCD+Lattice" factorization approach, respectively. We first evaluated all relevant form factors $F_i(q^2)$ in the low $q^2$ region using the PQCD approach, and we also take the available Lattice QCD results at the end point $q^2_{max}$ as additional input to improve the extrapolation of the form factors to the high $q^2$ region. We calculated the branching ratios and other twelve kinds of physical observables. We find the following points: (a) for $ B_s \to K l^+ l^$ decays, the PQCD and "PQCD+Lattice" predictions for branching ratios (BRs) ${\cal B}(B_s \to K l^+ l^)$, the ratios of the BRs $R_K^{e\mu,\mu\tau }$ and the longitudinal polarization asymmetry of the leptons $P_L$ agree well within errors; (b) the "PQCD+Lattice" prediction ${\cal B}(B_s \to K^\ast \mu^+ \mu^)=(2.58^{+0.69}_{0.60})\times 10^{8}$ does agree well with the LHCb measured value $ (2.9\pm 1.1 ) \times 10^{8}$; (c) for the angular observables $P_{1,2,3}$ and $P^\prime_{4,5,6,8}$ , our theoretical predictions for each lepton $l^$ are consistent within errors; (d) the theoretical predictions of the angular observables $P_3$ and $P'_{6,8}$ are less than $10^{2}$ in absolute value, but the magnitude of $P_{1,2}$ and $P'_{4,5}$ are larger than $0.2$; and (e) the PQCD and "PQCD+Lattice" predictions of the binned values of all considered observables in the two $q^2$bins $[0.10.98]$GeV$^2$ and $[1.16]$GeV$^2$ generally agree with each other and also be consistent with the LCSR results within errors. We believe that above predictions could be measured by future LHCb and BelleII experiments.
 [6] arXiv:2003.12320 (crosslist from hepph) [pdf, other]

Title: Improving $t \bar{t}$ reconstruction in the dilepton channel at future lepton collidersComments: 17 pages, 5 figures, 3 tablesSubjects: High Energy Physics  Phenomenology (hepph); High Energy Physics  Experiment (hepex)
A future lepton collider, such as the proposed CLIC or ILC, would allow to study top quark properties with unprecedented precision. In this paper, we present a method to reconstruct the $t \bar{t}$ decay in the dilepton channel at future $e^+e^$ colliders. We derive a simple, closed analytical expression for the neutrino fourmomenta as a function of the $W$ boson mass and develop a maximization procedure to find the optimal solution for the reconstruction of the full $t \bar{t}$ event. We show that our method is able to reconstruct neutrino fourmomenta with an error of less than $2 \, \%$ in $60 \, \%$ of the times. Finally, we test the performance of this reconstruction method in the calculation of the helicity fractions of the $W$ boson. A precise measurement of these observables could be used to probe new physics effects in the $Wtb$ vertex. We find that, from a large $t \bar{t}$ sample, our reconstruction method allows to calculate these observables with an accuracy better than $1 \, \%$.
 [7] arXiv:2003.12376 (crosslist from physics.insdet) [pdf, other]

Title: Cosmic muon flux measurement and tunnel overburden structure imagingAuthors: Ran Han, Qian Yu, Zhiwei Li, Jingtai Li, Yaping Cheng, Bin Liao, Lixiang Jiang, Sidao Ni, Tianfang Liu, Zheng WangSubjects: Instrumentation and Detectors (physics.insdet); Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astroph.IM); High Energy Physics  Experiment (hepex)
We present a cosmic ray muon tomographic experiment for measuring the muon flux and imaging the tunnel overburden structures in Changshu, China. The device used in this study is a tracking detector based on the plastic scintillator with SiPM technology, which can be conveniently operated in field works. The compact system with sensitive area of $6400 cm^2$ can measure the angular distribution of cosmic muons. It's able to image the overburden density length from the surface of overburden to the detector along the muon tracks. The open sky muon flux measurement outside the tunnel has a good agreement with the modified Gassier Formula model. The distributions of muon flux at three positions inside the tunnel are very similar to that of open sky. Assuming the average density of overburden compact sandstone is $2.65 g/cm^3$, the overburden thickness can be obtained from the density length derived from the difference of muon flux inside and outside the tunnel. Moreover, for known penetrated lengths (i.e., topography of overburden), the density anomalies of the overburden can also been obtained. This study suggests a potential application for imaging and detecting subsurface structures in civil engineering, tunnels or caverns with the cosmic ray muon telescope.
 [8] arXiv:2003.12391 (crosslist from hepph) [pdf, other]

Title: What pp SUSY limits mean for future e$^+$e$^$ collidersAuthors: Mikael Berggren (1) ((1) DESY, Hamburg, Germany)Comments: Contribution to the International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders (LCWS2019), Sendai, Japan,28 October1 November, 2019. C191028Subjects: High Energy Physics  Phenomenology (hepph); High Energy Physics  Experiment (hepex)
It is wellknown that e$^+$e$^$ colliders have the power to with certainty exclude or discover any SUSY model that predicts a Next to lightest SUSY particle (an NLSP) that has a mass up to slightly below the half the centreofmass energy of the collider. Here, we present an estimation of the power of present and future hadron colliders to extend the reach of searches for SUSY, with particular emphasis whether it can be claimed that either discovery or exclusion is {\it guaranteed} in a region of LSP and NLSP masses  no set of values of the other SUSY could change the conclusion. A scan over SUSY parameter space was done, only requiring that the NLSP was a bosino  the hardest case  with mass not larger than a few TeV. The massspectrum, crosssections and decay branching ratios found in this region were confronted with projections of sensitivity at future hadron colliders. In our conclusions we weigh in the maturity of the analysis the projections are based upon. The conclusion is that although future hadron colliders have a large discoveryreach, i.e. potential to discover {\it some} SUSY model, hardly any models with lowtomedium LSPNLSP massdifferences can be excluded with certainty. The models that are expected to be excluded/discovered are, on one hand, those with massdifferences larger than those allowed by models with GUTscale $M_1$$M_2$ unification, and on the other hand, a tiny region where the massdifference is so small that the NLSP decays in the tracking volume of the detectors. Excluding the latter possibility does not, however, allow to exclude the possibility of a Wino or Higgsino LSP: at any value of the LSP mass, we could identify models where the NLSP lifetime would be too short for a signal to be seen.
 [9] arXiv:2003.12421 (crosslist from hepph) [pdf, other]

Title: Charm Physics Confronts High$p_T$ Lepton TailsComments: 34 pages, 7 figuresSubjects: High Energy Physics  Phenomenology (hepph); High Energy Physics  Experiment (hepex)
We present a systematic survey of possible shortdistance newphysics effects in (semi)leptonic charged and neutralcurrent charmed meson decays. Using the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT) to analyze the most relevant experimental data at low and high energies, we demonstrate a striking complementarity between charm decays and high invariant mass lepton tails at the LHC. Interestingly enough, high$p_T$ DrellYan data offer competitive constraints on most new physics scenarios. Furthermore, the full set of correlated constraints from $K$, $\pi$ and $\tau$ decays imposed by $SU(2)_L$ gauge invariance is considered. The bounds from $D_{(s)}$ decays, high$p_T$ lepton tails and $SU(2)_L$ relations chart the space of the SMEFT affecting semi(leptonic) charm flavor transitions.
 [10] arXiv:2003.12440 (crosslist from physics.insdet) [pdf, other]

Title: Using Machine Learning to Speed Up and Improve Calorimeter R&DAuthors: Fedor RatnikovComments: "Calorimetry for High Energy Frontier" conference 2019' Fukuoka, JapanSubjects: Instrumentation and Detectors (physics.insdet); Machine Learning (cs.LG); High Energy Physics  Experiment (hepex)
Design of new experiments, as well as upgrade of ongoing ones, is a continuous process in the experimental high energy physics. Since the best solution is a tradeoff between different kinds of limitations, a quick turn over is necessary to evaluate physics performance for different techniques in different configurations. Two typical problems which slow down evaluation of physics performance for particular approaches to calorimeter detector technologies and configurations are:
 Emulating particular detector properties including raw detector response together with a signal processing chain to adequately simulate a calorimeter response for different signal and background conditions. This includes combining detector properties obtained from the general Geant simulation with properties obtained from different kinds of bench and beam tests of detector and electronics prototypes.
 Building an adequate reconstruction algorithm for physics reconstruction of the detector response which is reasonably tuned to extract the most of the performance provided by the given detector configuration.
Being approached from the first principles, both problems require significant development efforts. Fortunately, both problems may be addressed by using modern machine learning approaches, that allow a combination of available details of the detector techniques into corresponding higher level physics performance in a semiautomated way. In this paper, we discuss the use of advanced machine learning techniques to speed up and improve the precision of the detector development and optimisation cycle, with an emphasis on the experience and practical results obtained by applying this approach to epitomising the electromagnetic calorimeter design as a part of the upgrade project for the LHCb detector at LHC.  [11] arXiv:2003.12466 (crosslist from physics.insdet) [pdf, other]

Title: Track Finding at Belle IIAuthors: Valerio Bertacchi, Tadeas Bilka, Nils Braun, Giulia Casarosa, Luigi Corona, Sam Cunliffe, Filippo Dattola, Gaetano De Marino, Michael De Nuccio, Giacomo De Pietro, Thanh Van Dong, Giulio Dujany, Patrick Ecker, Michael Eliachevitch, Tristan Fillinger, Oliver Frost, Rudolf Fruehwirth, Uwe Gebauer, Alexander Glazov, Nicolas Gosling, Aiqiang Guo, Thomas Hauth, Martin Heck, Mateusz Kaleta, Jakub Kandra, Claus Kleinwort, Thomas Kuhr, Simon Kurz, Peter Kvasnicka, Jakob Lettenbichler, Thomas Lueck, Alberto Martini, Felix Metzner, Dmitrii Neverov, Carsten Niebuhr, Eugenio Paoloni, Sourav Patra, Leo Piilonen, Cyrille Praz, Markus Tobias Prim, Christian Pulvermacher, Sebastian Racs, Navid Rad, Petar Rados, Martin Ritter, Giuliana Rizzo, Armine Rostomyan, Bianca Scavino, Tobias Schlueter, Benjamin Schwenker, et al. (8 additional authors not shown)Subjects: Instrumentation and Detectors (physics.insdet); High Energy Physics  Experiment (hepex)
This paper describes the trackfinding algorithm that is used for event reconstruction in the Belle II experiment operating at the SuperKEKB Bfactory in Tsukuba, Japan. The algorithm is designed to balance the requirements of a high efficiency to find charged particles with a good track parameter resolution, a low rate of spurious tracks, and a reasonable demand on CPU resources. The software is implemented in a flexible, modular manner and employs a diverse selection of global and local trackfinding algorithms to achieve an optimal performance.
 [12] arXiv:2003.12483 (crosslist from physics.insdet) [pdf, other]

Title: Finding Dark Matter Faster with Explicit Profile LikelihoodsSubjects: Instrumentation and Detectors (physics.insdet); Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astroph.CO); Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astroph.IM); High Energy Physics  Experiment (hepex)
Liquid xenon timeprojection chambers are the world's most sensitive detectors for a wide range of dark matter candidates. We show that the statistical analysis of their data can be improved by replacing detector response Monte Carlo simulations with an equivalent deterministic calculation. This allows the use of highdimensional undiscretized models, yielding up to $\sim\! 2$ times better discrimination of the dominant backgrounds. In turn, this could significantly extend the physics reach of upcoming experiments such as XENONnT and LZ, and bring forward a potential $5 \sigma$ dark matter discovery by over a year.
Replacements for Mon, 30 Mar 20
 [13] arXiv:1808.08051 (replaced) [pdf, other]

Title: Integration with an Adaptive Harmonic Mean AlgorithmSubjects: Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability (physics.dataan); Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astroph.IM); High Energy Physics  Experiment (hepex)
 [14] arXiv:1911.07558 (replaced) [pdf, other]

Title: Search for supersymmetry in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV with 137 fb$^{1}$ in final states with a single lepton using the sum of masses of largeradius jetsAuthors: CMS CollaborationComments: Replaced with the published version. Added the journal reference and the DOI. All the figures and tables can be found at this http URL (CMS Public Pages)Journalref: Phys. Rev. D 1010 (2020) 052010Subjects: High Energy Physics  Experiment (hepex)
 [15] arXiv:1911.10805 (replaced) [pdf, other]

Title: Nuclear EDM from SMEFT flavorchanging operatorComments: 21 pages, 15 figuresSubjects: High Energy Physics  Phenomenology (hepph); High Energy Physics  Experiment (hepex)
 [16] arXiv:1912.06374 (replaced) [pdf, other]

Title: Interference effects in dilepton resonance searches for Z' bosons and dark matter mediatorsComments: v2 matches version accepted by JHEP. 14 pages + appendices, 9 figures + 1 table, ZPEED code to calculate dilepton likelihoods available at this http URLJournalref: JHEP 2003 (2020) 104Subjects: High Energy Physics  Phenomenology (hepph); High Energy Physics  Experiment (hepex)
 [17] arXiv:1912.12411 (replaced) [pdf, ps, other]

Title: Observation of $D^+\toηηπ^+$ and improved measurement of $D^{0(+)}\toηπ^+π^{(0)}$Authors: BESIII Collaboration (M. Ablikim, M. N. Achasov, P. Adlarson, S. Ahmed, M. Albrecht, M. Alekseev, A. Amoroso, Q. An, Anita, Y. Bai, O. Bakina, R. Baldini Ferroli, I. Balossino, Y. Ban, K. Begzsuren, J. V. Bennett, N. Berger, M. Bertani, D. Bettoni, F. Bianchi, J Biernat, J. Bloms, I. Boyko, R. A. Briere, H. Cai, X. Cai, A. Calcaterra, G. F. Cao, N. Cao, S. A. Cetin, J. Chai, J. F. Chang, W. L. Chang, G. Chelkov, D. Y. Chen, G. Chen, H. S. Chen, J. Chen, M. L. Chen, S. J. Chen, X. R. Chen, Y. B. Chen, W. Cheng, G. Cibinetto, F. Cossio, X. F. Cui, H. L. Dai, J. P. Dai, X. C. Dai, A. Dbeyssi, D. Dedovich, Z. Y. Deng, A. Denig, I. Denysenko, M. Destefanis, F. De Mori, Y. Ding, C. Dong, J. Dong, L. Y. Dong, M. Y. Dong, Z. L. Dou, S. X. Du, J. Fang, S. S. Fang, Y. Fang, R. Farinelli, L. Fava, F. Feldbauer, G. Felici, C. Q. Feng, M. Fritsch, C. D. Fu, Y. Fu, X. L. Gao, Y. Gao, Y. Gao, Y. G. Gao, I. Garzia, E. M. Gersabeck, A. Gilman, K. Goetzen, L. Gong, W. X. Gong, W. Gradl, M. Greco, L. M. Gu, M. H. Gu, S. Gu, Y. T. Gu, A. Q. Guo, L. B. Guo, R. P. Guo, Y. P. Guo, Y. P. Guo, A. Guskov, S. Han, T. T. Han, X. Q. Hao, F. A. Harris, K. L. He, F. H. Heinsius, T. Held, Y. K. Heng, M. Himmelreich, T. Holtmann, Y. R. Hou, Z. L. Hou, H. M. Hu, J. F. Hu, T. Hu, Y. Hu, G. S. Huang, J. S. Huang, X. T. Huang, X. Z. Huang, N. Huesken, T. Hussain, W. Ikegami Andersson, W. Imoehl, M. Irshad, S. Jaeger, Q. Ji, Q. P. Ji, X. B. Ji, X. L. Ji, H. B. Jiang, X. S. Jiang, X. Y. Jiang, J. B. Jiao, Z. Jiao, D. P. Jin, S. Jin, Y. Jin, T. Johansson, N. KalantarNayestanaki, X. S. Kang, R. Kappert, M. Kavatsyuk, B. C. Ke, I. K. Keshk, A. Khoukaz, P. Kiese, R. Kiuchi, R. Kliemt, L. Koch, O. B. Kolcu, B. Kopf, M. Kuemmel, M. Kuessner, A. Kupsc, M. G. Kurth, W. Kühn, J. S. Lange, P. Larin, L. Lavezzi, H. Leithoff, T. Lenz, C. Li, C. H. Li, Cheng Li, D. M. Li, F. Li, G. Li, H. B. Li, H. J. Li, J. C. Li, Ke Li, L. K. Li, Lei Li, P. L. Li, P. R. Li, S. Y. Li, W. D. Li, W. G. Li, X. H. Li, X. L. Li, X. N. Li, Z. B. Li, Z. Y. Li, H. Liang, H. Liang, Y. F. Liang, Y. T. Liang, G. R. Liao, L. Z. Liao, J. Libby, C. X. Lin, D. X. Lin, Y. J. Lin, B. Liu, B. J. Liu, C. X. Liu, D. Liu, D. Y. Liu, F. H. Liu, Fang Liu, Feng Liu, H. B. Liu, H. M. Liu, Huanhuan Liu, Huihui Liu, J. B. Liu, J. Y. Liu, K. Liu, K. Y. Liu, Ke Liu, L. Liu, L. Y. Liu, Q. Liu, S. B. Liu, T. Liu, X. Liu, X. Y. Liu, Y. B. Liu, Z. A. Liu, Z. Q. Liu, Y. F. Long, X. C. Lou, H. J. Lu, J. D. Lu, J. G. Lu, Y. Lu, Y. P. Lu, C. L. Luo, M. X. Luo, P. W. Luo, T. Luo, X. L. Luo, S. Lusso, X. R. Lyu, F. C. Ma, H. L. Ma, L. L. Ma, M. M. Ma, Q. M. Ma, R. T. Ma, X. N. Ma, X. X. Ma, X. Y. Ma, Y. M. Ma, F. E. Maas, M. Maggiora, S. Maldaner, S. Malde, Q. A. Malik, A. Mangoni, Y. J. Mao, Z. P. Mao, S. Marcello, Z. X. Meng, J. G. Messchendorp, G. Mezzadri, J. Min, T. J. Min, R. E. Mitchell, X. H. Mo, Y. J. Mo, C. Morales Morales, N. Yu. Muchnoi, H. Muramatsu, A. Mustafa, S. Nakhoul, Y. Nefedov, F. Nerling, I. B. Nikolaev, Z. Ning, S. Nisar, S. L. Olsen, Q. Ouyang, S. Pacetti, X. Pan, Y. Pan, M. Papenbrock, P. Patteri, M. Pelizaeus, H. P. Peng, K. Peters, J. Pettersson, J. L. Ping, R. G. Ping, A. Pitka, R. Poling, V. Prasad, H. Qi, H. R. Qi, M. Qi, T. Y. Qi, S. Qian, C. F. Qiao, X. P. Qin, X. S. Qin, Z. H. Qin, J. F. Qiu, S. Q. Qu, K. H. Rashid, K. Ravindran, C. F. Redmer, M. Richter, A. Rivetti, V. Rodin, M. Rolo, G. Rong, Ch. Rosner, M. Rump, A. Sarantsev, M. Savrié, Y. Schelhaas, C. Schnier, K. Schoenning, W. Shan, X. Y. Shan, M. Shao, C. P. Shen, P. X. Shen, X. Y. Shen, H. Y. Sheng, X. Shi, X. D Shi, J. J. Song, Q. Q. Song, X. Y. Song, Y. X. Song, S. Sosio, C. Sowa, S. Spataro, F. F. Sui, G. X. Sun, J. F. Sun, L. Sun, S. S. Sun, Y. J. Sun, Y. K Sun, Y. Z. Sun, Z. J. Sun, Z. T. Sun, Y. X. Tan, C. J. Tang, G. Y. Tang, X. Tang, V. Thoren, B. Tsednee, I. Uman, B. Wang, B. L. Wang, C. W. Wang, D. Y. Wang, K. Wang, L. L. Wang, L. S. Wang, M. Wang, M. Z. Wang, Meng Wang, P. L. Wang, W. P. Wang, X. Wang, X. F. Wang, X. L. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. D. Wang, Y. F. Wang, Y. Q. Wang, Z. Wang, Z. G. Wang, Z. Y. Wang, Ziyi Wang, Zongyuan Wang, T. Weber, D. H. Wei, P. Weidenkaff, F. Weidner, H. W. Wen, S. P. Wen, U. Wiedner, G. Wilkinson, M. Wolke, L. Wollenberg, L. H. Wu, L. J. Wu, Z. Wu, L. Xia, S. Y. Xiao, Y. J. Xiao, Z. J. Xiao, Y. G. Xie, Y. H. Xie, T. Y. Xing, X. A. Xiong, G. F. Xu, J. J. Xu, Q. J. Xu, W. Xu, X. P. Xu, F. Yan, L. Yan, L. Yan, W. B. Yan, W. C. Yan, H. J. Yang, H. X. Yang, L. Yang, R. X. Yang, S. L. Yang, Y. H. Yang, Y. X. Yang, Yifan Yang, Zhi Yang, M. Ye, M. H. Ye, J. H. Yin, Z. Y. You, B. X. Yu, C. X. Yu, J. S. Yu, T. Yu, C. Z. Yuan, X. Q. Yuan, Y. Yuan, C. X. Yue, A. Yuncu, A. A. Zafar, Y. Zeng, B. X. Zhang, B. Y. Zhang, C. C. Zhang, D. H. Zhang, H. H. Zhang, H. Y. Zhang, J. L. Zhang, J. Q. Zhang, J. W. Zhang, J. Y. Zhang, J. Z. Zhang, L. Zhang, Lei Zhang, S. F. Zhang, T. J. Zhang, X. Y. Zhang, Y. H. Zhang, Y. T. Zhang, Yan Zhang, Yao Zhang, Yi Zhang, Yu Zhang, Z. H. Zhang, Z. P. Zhang, Z. Y. Zhang, G. Zhao, J. Zhao, J. W. Zhao, J. Y. Zhao, J. Z. Zhao, Lei Zhao, Ling Zhao, M. G. Zhao, Q. Zhao, S. J. Zhao, T. C. Zhao, Y. B. Zhao, Z. G. Zhao, A. Zhemchugov, B. Zheng, J. P. Zheng, Y. Zheng, Y. H. Zheng, B. Zhong, L. Zhou, L. P. Zhou, Q. Zhou, X. Zhou, X. K. Zhou, X. R. Zhou, A. N. Zhu, J. Zhu, K. Zhu, K. J. Zhu, S. H. Zhu, W. J. Zhu, X. L. Zhu, Y. C. Zhu, Y. S. Zhu, Z. A. Zhu, J. Zhuang, B. S. Zou, J. H. Zou)Comments: 10 pages, 4 figuresJournalref: Phys. Rev. D 101, 052009 (2020)Subjects: High Energy Physics  Experiment (hepex)
 [18] arXiv:2002.12910 (replaced) [pdf, other]

Title: Addressing $R_{D^{(*)}}$, $R_{K^{(*)}}$, muon $g2$ and ANITA anomalies in a minimal $R$parity violating supersymmetric frameworkComments: 33 pages, 24 figures, 5 tables; added more discussion and referencesSubjects: High Energy Physics  Phenomenology (hepph); High Energy Physics  Experiment (hepex)
 [19] arXiv:2003.04828 (replaced) [pdf, other]

Title: Extracting the Transverse Momentum Dependent Polarizing Fragmentation FunctionsComments: 9 pages, 7 figures, updated fit and improved textSubjects: High Energy Physics  Phenomenology (hepph); High Energy Physics  Experiment (hepex); Nuclear Experiment (nuclex); Nuclear Theory (nuclth)
 [20] arXiv:2003.09072 (replaced) [pdf, other]

Title: Beam Size Reconstruction from Ionization Profile MonitorsAuthors: Vladimir ShiltsevComments: 6 pages, 5 FigsSubjects: Accelerator Physics (physics.accph); High Energy Physics  Experiment (hepex)
 [21] arXiv:2003.11043 (replaced) [pdf, other]

Title: Disentangling new physics effects on nonresonant Higgs boson pair production from gluon fusionComments: References are added: 29 pages with 8 figuresSubjects: High Energy Physics  Phenomenology (hepph); High Energy Physics  Experiment (hepex)
[ showing up to 2000 entries per page: fewer  more ]
Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
Links to: arXiv, form interface, find, hepex, recent, 2003, contact, help (Access key information)