We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.

Geophysics

New submissions

[ total of 5 entries: 1-5 ]
[ showing up to 2000 entries per page: fewer | more ]

New submissions for Tue, 22 Sep 20

[1]  arXiv:2009.09244 [pdf]
Title: Determining geopotential difference via relativistic precise point positioning time comparison: A case study using simulated observations
Subjects: Geophysics (physics.geo-ph)

According to general relativity theory (GRT), the geopotential difference (GD) can be determined by comparing the change in time difference between precise clocks using the precise point positioning (PPP) time transfer technique, referred to as the relativistic PPP time comparison approach. We focused on high-precision time comparison between two precise clocks for determining the GD using the relativistic PPP time transfer,and conducted simulation experiments to validate the approach. In the experiments, we consider three cases to evaluate the performance of the approach using clocks with different stabilities, namely, the frequency stabilities of the clocks equipped at three selected ground stations are respectively (Case 1), (Case 2), and (Case 3) at time period. Conclusions are drawn from the experimental results. First, high-precision clocks can significantly improve the accuracy for PPP time transfer, but the improvement is limited by measurement noises. Compared to Case 1, the long-term stabilities of OPMT-BRUX as well as PTBB-BRUX are improved in Cases 2 and 3. The frequency stabilities of Cases 1-3 are approximately 4.28*10-16, 4.00*10-17, and 3.22*10-17 at 10-day averaging time for OPMT-BRUX, respectively, and for PTBB-BRUX, these values are approximately 3.73*10-16, 8.17*10-17, and 4.64*10-17. Second, the geopotential difference between any two stations can be determined at the decimeter level, with its accuracy being consistent with the stabilities of the time links in Cases 1-3. In Case 3, the determined geopotential differences between OPMT and BRUX deviate from the EIGEN-6C4 model values by -0.64 m2/s2 with an uncertainty of 1.11 m2/s2, whereas the deviation error between PTBB and BRUX is 0.76 m2/s2 with an uncertainty of 1.79 m2/s2. The approach proposed in this study can be also applied to testing GRT.

Cross-lists for Tue, 22 Sep 20

[2]  arXiv:2009.09902 (cross-list from physics.ao-ph) [pdf, other]
Title: Basin stability and limit cycles in a conceptual model for climate tipping cascades
Comments: 39 pages, 8 figures
Subjects: Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics (physics.ao-ph); Geophysics (physics.geo-ph)

Tipping elements in the climate system are large-scale subregions of the Earth that might possess threshold behavior under global warming with large potential impacts on human societies. Here, we study a subset of five tipping elements and their interactions in a conceptual and easily extendable framework: the Greenland and West Antarctic Ice Sheets, the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), the El-Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and the Amazon rainforest. In this nonlinear and multistable system, we perform a basin stability analysis to detect its stable states and their associated Earth system resilience. We investigate dynamic regimes where some of the states lose stability and oscillations appear using a newly developed basin bifurcation analysis methodology. We perform a large-scale robustness analysis using a Monte Carlo approach to propagate the large uncertainties associated with the critical temperature thresholds and the interaction strengths of the tipping elements. In our multistability analysis, we reveal that the state of four or five tipped elements is dominant for large levels of global warming beyond 4{\deg}C above pre-industrial climate conditions. For lower levels of warming, states including disintegrated ice sheets on West Antarctica and Greenland have higher basin volume than other state configurations. We also detect the emergence of limit cycles for 0.6% of all ensemble members at rare parameter combinations. Such limit cycle oscillations mainly occur between the Greenland Ice Sheet and AMOC (86%), due to their negative feedback coupling. These limit cycles point to possibly dangerous internal modes of variability in the climate system that could have played a role in paleoclimatic dynamics such as those unfolding during the Pleistocene ice age cycles.

Replacements for Tue, 22 Sep 20

[3]  arXiv:2003.11938 (replaced) [pdf, other]
Title: Toward source region tomography with inter-source interferometry: Shear wave velocity from 2018 West Bohemia swarm earthquakes
Authors: Tom Eulenfeld
Comments: Version after peer-review
Journal-ref: Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 125, e2020JB019931 (2020)
Subjects: Geophysics (physics.geo-ph)
[4]  arXiv:2006.12990 (replaced) [pdf, other]
Title: The Marchenko method for evanescent waves
Authors: Kees Wapenaar
Comments: 15 pages, 6 figures
Journal-ref: Geophysical Journal International 223 (2020) 1412-1417
Subjects: Geophysics (physics.geo-ph)
[5]  arXiv:2006.13310 (replaced) [pdf, other]
Title: Bedrock reconstruction from free surface data for unidirectional glacier flow with basal slip
Comments: 25 pages, 14 figures
Subjects: Geophysics (physics.geo-ph); Fluid Dynamics (physics.flu-dyn)
[ total of 5 entries: 1-5 ]
[ showing up to 2000 entries per page: fewer | more ]

Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Links to: arXiv, form interface, find, physics, recent, 2009, contact, help  (Access key information)