We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.

Quantitative Methods

New submissions

[ total of 5 entries: 1-5 ]
[ showing up to 2000 entries per page: fewer | more ]

New submissions for Thu, 27 Jan 22

[1]  arXiv:2201.10895 [pdf]
Title: A novel sustainable role of compost as a universal protective substitute for fish, chicken, pig, and cattle, and its estimation by structural equation modeling
Subjects: Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM)

Natural decomposition of organic matter is important in food systems, and compost is worldwidely used as an organic fermented fertilizer, but, as a feature of ecosystem, its effects on the animals are poorly understood. Here we show that oral administration of compost itself and/or its included thermophilic Bacillaceae, i.e. Caldibacillus hisashii and Weizmannia coagulans, can regulate the prophylactic activities of various industrial animals. In these regulatory processes, biological defense responses and/or efficient utilization of fecal metabolites were in consistent with the alterations in animal species-specific fecal inhabitant microbiota with reduced pathogenic and/or non-pathogenic damages dependent upon environmental conditions. Further association analysis predicted useful gut inhabitant useful bacteria and metabolites that interacted with the compost and/or its derived thermophiles, as common key components beyond the animal species. These results highlight the potentials of universal probiotics based on the microbial structure of compost for sustainable protective control in agriculture, fishery and livestock industries.

[2]  arXiv:2201.10960 [pdf]
Title: Repetition and reproduction of preclinical medical studies: taking a leaf from the plant sciences with consideration of generalised systematic errors
Comments: 40 pages, 1 figure, 3 tables. Supplemental files at this https URL
Subjects: Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM)

Reproduction of pre-clinical results has a high failure rate. The fundamental methodology including replication ("protocol") for hypothesis testing/validation to a state allowing inference, varies within medical and plant sciences with little justification. Here, five protocols are distinguished which deal differently with systematic/random errors and vary considerably in result veracity. Aim: to compare prevalence of protocols (defined in text). Medical/plant science articles from 2017/2019 were surveyed: 713 random articles assessed for eligibility for counts: first (with p-values): 1) non-replicated; 2) global; 3) triple-result protocols; second: 4) replication-error protocol; 5) meta-analyses. Inclusion criteria: human/plant/fungal studies with categorical groups. Exclusion criteria: phased clinical trials, pilot studies, cases, reviews, technology, rare subjects, -omic studies. Abbreviated PICOS question: which protocol was evident for a main result with categorically distinct group difference(s) ? Electronic sources: Journal Citation Reports 2017/2019, Google. Triplication prevalence differed dramatically between sciences (both years p<10-16; cluster-adjusted chi-squared tests): From 320 studies (80/science/year): in 2017, 53 (66%, 95% confidence interval (C.I.) 56%:77%) and in 2019, 48 (60%, C.I. 49%:71%) plant studies had triple-result or triplicated global protocols, compared with, in both years, 4 (5%, C.I. 0.19%:9.8%) medical studies. Plant sciences had a higher prevalence of protocols more likely to counter generalised systematic errors (the most likely cause of false positives) and random error than non-replicated protocols, without suffering from serious flaws found with random-Institutes protocols. It is suggested that a triple-result (organised-reproduction) protocol, with Institute consortia, is likely to solve most problems connected with the replicability crisis.

Replacements for Thu, 27 Jan 22

[3]  arXiv:2110.15200 (replaced) [pdf, other]
Title: Generating 3D Molecules Conditional on Receptor Binding Sites with Deep Generative Models
Comments: Main: 12 pages, 7 figures; Supplement: 6 pages, 14 figures
Subjects: Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
[4]  arXiv:2107.11770 (replaced) [pdf, other]
Title: Data-based stochastic modeling reveals sources of activity bursts in single-cell TGF-$β$ signaling
Comments: 27 pages, 7 figures, 5 tables
Subjects: Molecular Networks (q-bio.MN); Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM)
[5]  arXiv:2201.09351 (replaced) [pdf]
Title: The risk of bias in denoising methods
Authors: Kendrick Kay
Comments: 19 pages, 4 figures (v2 update to fix author information)
Subjects: Applications (stat.AP); Image and Video Processing (eess.IV); Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM)
[ total of 5 entries: 1-5 ]
[ showing up to 2000 entries per page: fewer | more ]

Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Links to: arXiv, form interface, find, q-bio, recent, 2201, contact, help  (Access key information)