Quantitative Methods
New submissions
[ showing up to 2000 entries per page: fewer | more ]
New submissions for Thu, 30 Mar 23
- [1] arXiv:2303.16209 [pdf]
-
Title: AmorProt: Amino Acid Molecular Fingerprints Repurposing based Protein FingerprintSubjects: Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
As protein therapeutics play an important role in almost all medical fields, numerous studies have been conducted on proteins using artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence has enabled data driven predictions without the need for expensive experiments. Nevertheless, unlike the various molecular fingerprint algorithms that have been developed, protein fingerprint algorithms have rarely been studied. In this study, we proposed the amino acid molecular fingerprints repurposing based protein (AmorProt) fingerprint, a protein sequence representation method that effectively uses the molecular fingerprints corresponding to 20 amino acids. Subsequently, the performances of the tree based machine learning and artificial neural network models were compared using (1) amyloid classification and (2) isoelectric point regression. Finally, the applicability and advantages of the developed platform were demonstrated through a case study and the following experiments: (3) comparison of dataset dependence with feature based methods; (4) feature importance analysis; and (5) protein space analysis. Consequently, the significantly improved model performance and data set independent versatility of the AmorProt fingerprint were verified. The results revealed that the current protein representation method can be applied to various fields related to proteins, such as predicting their fundamental properties or interaction with ligands.
- [2] arXiv:2303.16725 [pdf]
-
Title: Machine Learning for Uncovering Biological Insights in Spatial Transcriptomics DataSubjects: Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Development and homeostasis in multicellular systems both require exquisite control over spatial molecular pattern formation and maintenance. Advances in spatially-resolved and high-throughput molecular imaging methods such as multiplexed immunofluorescence and spatial transcriptomics (ST) provide exciting new opportunities to augment our fundamental understanding of these processes in health and disease. The large and complex datasets resulting from these techniques, particularly ST, have led to rapid development of innovative machine learning (ML) tools primarily based on deep learning techniques. These ML tools are now increasingly featured in integrated experimental and computational workflows to disentangle signals from noise in complex biological systems. However, it can be difficult to understand and balance the different implicit assumptions and methodologies of a rapidly expanding toolbox of analytical tools in ST. To address this, we summarize major ST analysis goals that ML can help address and current analysis trends. We also describe four major data science concepts and related heuristics that can help guide practitioners in their choices of the right tools for the right biological questions.
Cross-lists for Thu, 30 Mar 23
- [3] arXiv:2303.16417 (cross-list from cs.CV) [pdf]
-
Title: Problems and shortcuts in deep learning for screening mammographyAuthors: Trevor Tsue, Brent Mombourquette, Ahmed Taha, Thomas Paul Matthews, Yen Nhi Truong Vu, Jason SuSubjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM)
This work reveals undiscovered challenges in the performance and generalizability of deep learning models. We (1) identify spurious shortcuts and evaluation issues that can inflate performance and (2) propose training and analysis methods to address them.
We trained an AI model to classify cancer on a retrospective dataset of 120,112 US exams (3,467 cancers) acquired from 2008 to 2017 and 16,693 UK exams (5,655 cancers) acquired from 2011 to 2015.
We evaluated on a screening mammography test set of 11,593 US exams (102 cancers; 7,594 women; age 57.1 \pm 11.0) and 1,880 UK exams (590 cancers; 1,745 women; age 63.3 \pm 7.2). A model trained on images of only view markers (no breast) achieved a 0.691 AUC. The original model trained on both datasets achieved a 0.945 AUC on the combined US+UK dataset but paradoxically only 0.838 and 0.892 on the US and UK datasets, respectively. Sampling cancers equally from both datasets during training mitigated this shortcut. A similar AUC paradox (0.903) occurred when evaluating diagnostic exams vs screening exams (0.862 vs 0.861, respectively). Removing diagnostic exams during training alleviated this bias. Finally, the model did not exhibit the AUC paradox over scanner models but still exhibited a bias toward Selenia Dimension (SD) over Hologic Selenia (HS) exams. Analysis showed that this AUC paradox occurred when a dataset attribute had values with a higher cancer prevalence (dataset bias) and the model consequently assigned a higher probability to these attribute values (model bias). Stratification and balancing cancer prevalence can mitigate shortcuts during evaluation.
Dataset and model bias can introduce shortcuts and the AUC paradox, potentially pervasive issues within the healthcare AI space. Our methods can verify and mitigate shortcuts while providing a clear understanding of performance.
Replacements for Thu, 30 Mar 23
- [4] arXiv:2303.08863 (replaced) [pdf, other]
-
Title: Class-Guided Image-to-Image Diffusion: Cell Painting from Brightfield Images with Class LabelsAuthors: Jan Oscar Cross-Zamirski, Praveen Anand, Guy Williams, Elizabeth Mouchet, Yinhai Wang, Carola-Bibiane SchönliebSubjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM)
- [5] arXiv:2303.15851 (replaced) [pdf, other]
[ showing up to 2000 entries per page: fewer | more ]
Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
Links to: arXiv, form interface, find, q-bio, recent, 2303, contact, help (Access key information)