Quantitative Finance
New submissions
[ showing up to 2000 entries per page: fewer  more ]
New submissions for Tue, 22 Aug 17
 [1] arXiv:1708.05713 [pdf]

Title: Portfolio Optimization with Entropic ValueatRiskSubjects: Portfolio Management (qfin.PM); Optimization and Control (math.OC); Risk Management (qfin.RM)
The entropic valueatrisk (EVaR) is a new coherent risk measure, which is an upper bound for both the valueatrisk (VaR) and conditional valueatrisk (CVaR). As important properties, the EVaR is strongly monotone over its domain and strictly monotone over a broad subdomain including all continuous distributions, while wellknown monotone risk measures, such as VaR and CVaR lack these properties. A key feature for a risk measure, besides its financial properties, is its applicability in largescale samplebased portfolio optimization. If the negative return of an investment portfolio is a differentiable convex function, the portfolio optimization with the EVaR results in a differentiable convex program whose number of variables and constraints is independent of the sample size, which is not the case for the VaR and CVaR. This enables us to design an efficient algorithm using differentiable convex optimization. Our extensive numerical study shows the high efficiency of the algorithm in large scales, compared to the existing convex optimization software packages. The computational efficiency of the EVaR portfolio optimization approach is also compared with that of CVaRbased portfolio optimization. This comparison shows that the EVaR approach generally performs similarly, and it outperforms as the sample size increases. Moreover, the comparison of the portfolios obtained for a real case by the EVaR and CVaR approaches shows that the EVaR approach can find portfolios with better expectations and VaR values at high confidence levels.
Crosslists for Tue, 22 Aug 17
 [2] arXiv:1708.05957 (crosslist from math.OC) [pdf, ps, other]

Title: BSDEs with weak reflections and partial hedging of American optionsSubjects: Optimization and Control (math.OC); Mathematical Finance (qfin.MF)
We introduce a new class of \textit{Backward Stochastic Differential Equations with weak reflections} whose solution $(Y,Z)$ satisfies the weak constraint $\textbf{E}[\Psi(\theta,Y_\theta)] \geq m,$ for all stopping time $\theta$ taking values between $0$ and a terminal time $T$, where $\Psi$ is a random nondecreasing map and $m$ a given threshold. We study the wellposedness of such equations and show that the family of minimal time $t$values $Y_t$ can be aggregated by a rightcontinuous process. We give a nonlinear Mertens type decomposition for lower reflected $g$submartingales, which to the best of our knowledge, represents a new result in the literature. Using this decomposition, we obtain a representation of the minimal time $t$values process. We also show that the minimal supersolution of a such equation can be written as a \textit{stochastic control/optimal stopping game}, which is shown to admit, under appropriate assumptions, a value and saddle points. From a financial point of view, this problem is related to the approximative hedging for American options.
 [3] arXiv:1708.06160 (crosslist from stat.AP) [pdf]

Title: Economic Design of MemoryType Control Charts: The Fallacy of the Formula Proposed by Lorenzen and Vance (1986)Subjects: Applications (stat.AP); Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science (cs.CE); Mathematical Software (cs.MS); Optimization and Control (math.OC); Economics (qfin.EC)
The memorytype control charts, such as EWMA and CUSUM, are powerful tools for detecting small quality changes in univariate and multivariate processes. Many papers on economic design of these control charts use the formula proposed by Lorenzen and Vance (1986) [Lorenzen, T. J., & Vance, L. C. (1986). The economic design of control charts: A unified approach. Technometrics, 28(1), 310, DOI: 10.2307/1269598]. This paper shows that this formula is not correct for memorytype control charts and its values can significantly deviate from the original values even if the ARL values used in this formula are accurately computed. Consequently, the use of this formula can result in charts that are not economically optimal. The formula is corrected for memorytype control charts, but unfortunately the modified formula is not a helpful tool from a computational perspective. We show that simulationbased optimization is a possible alternative method.
 [4] arXiv:1708.06233 (crosslist from cs.AI) [pdf, other]

Title: Fake News in Social NetworksSubjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA); Social and Information Networks (cs.SI); Physics and Society (physics.socph); Economics (qfin.EC)
We model the spread of news as a social learning game on a network. Agents can either endorse or oppose a claim made in a piece of news, which itself may be either true or false. Agents base their decision on a private signal and their neighbors' past actions. Given these inputs, agents follow strategies derived via multiagent deep reinforcement learning and receive utility from acting in accordance with the veracity of claims. Our framework yields strategies with agent utility close to a theoretical, Bayes optimal benchmark, while remaining flexible to model respecification. Optimized strategies allow agents to correctly identify most false claims, when all agents receive unbiased private signals. However, an adversary's attempt to spread fake news by targeting a subset of agents with a biased private signal can be successful. Even more so when the adversary has information about agents' network position or private signal. When agents are aware of the presence of an adversary they reoptimize their strategies in the training stage and the adversary's attack is less effective. Hence, exposing agents to the possibility of fake news can be an effective way to curtail the spread of fake news in social networks. Our results also highlight that information about the users' private beliefs and their social network structure can be extremely valuable to adversaries and should be well protected.
Replacements for Tue, 22 Aug 17
 [5] arXiv:1611.07843 (replaced) [pdf, other]

Title: Portfolio choice, portfolio liquidation, and portfolio transition under drift uncertaintySubjects: Portfolio Management (qfin.PM)
 [6] arXiv:1706.04844 (replaced) [pdf, other]

Title: On the minimizers of energy forms with completely monotone kernelSubjects: Optimization and Control (math.OC); Classical Analysis and ODEs (math.CA); Trading and Market Microstructure (qfin.TR)
[ showing up to 2000 entries per page: fewer  more ]
Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)