We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

math.CO

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Mathematics > Combinatorics

Title: Antimagic Labelings of Caterpillars

Abstract: A $k$-antimagic labeling of a graph $G$ is an injection from $E(G)$ to $\{1,2,\dots,|E(G)|+k\}$ such that all vertex sums are pairwise distinct, where the vertex sum at vertex $u$ is the sum of the labels assigned to edges incident to $u$. We call a graph $k$-antimagic when it has a $k$-antimagic labeling, and antimagic when it is 0-antimagic. Hartsfield and Ringel conjectured that every simple connected graph other than $K_2$ is antimagic, but the conjecture is still open even for trees. Here we study $k$-antimagic labelings of caterpillars, which are defined as trees the removal of whose leaves produces a path, called its spine. As a general result, we use constructive techniques to prove that any caterpillar of order $n$ is $(\lfloor (n-1)/2 \rfloor - 2)$-antimagic. Furthermore, if $C$ is a caterpillar with a spine of order $s$, we prove that when $C$ has at least $\lfloor (3s+1)/2 \rfloor$ leaves or $\lfloor (s-1)/2 \rfloor$ consecutive vertices of degree at most 2 at one end of a longest path, then $C$ is antimagic. As a consequence of a result by Wong and Zhu, we also prove that if $p$ is a prime number, any caterpillar with a spine of order $p$, $p-1$ or $p-2$ is $1$-antimagic.
Comments: 13 pages, 4 figures
Subjects: Combinatorics (math.CO)
MSC classes: 68R10
Cite as: arXiv:1708.00624 [math.CO]
  (or arXiv:1708.00624v3 [math.CO] for this version)

Submission history

From: Antoni Lozano [view email]
[v1] Wed, 2 Aug 2017 07:45:40 GMT (92kb,D)
[v2] Wed, 28 Feb 2018 10:26:26 GMT (88kb,D)
[v3] Mon, 7 Jan 2019 10:53:15 GMT (89kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.