### References & Citations

# Mathematics > Combinatorics

# Title: Bounding $χ$ by a fraction of $Δ$ for graphs without large cliques

(Submitted on 2 Mar 2018)

Abstract: The greedy coloring algorithm shows that a graph of maximum degree at most $\Delta$ has chromatic number at most $\Delta + 1$, and this is tight for cliques. Much attention has been devoted to improving this "greedy bound" for graphs without large cliques. Brooks famously proved that this bound can be improved by one if $\Delta \geq 3$ and the graph contains no clique of size $\Delta + 1$. Reed's Conjecture states that the "greedy bound" can be improved by $k$ if the graph contains no clique of size $\Delta + 1 - 2k$. Johansson proved that the "greedy bound" can be improved by a factor of $\Omega(\ln(\Delta)^{-1})$ or $\Omega\left(\frac{\ln(\ln(\Delta))}{\ln(\Delta)}\right)$ for graphs with no triangles or no cliques of any fixed size, respectively.

Notably missing is a $\textit{linear}$ improvement on the "greedy bound" for graphs without large cliques. In this paper, we prove that for sufficiently large $\Delta$, if $G$ is a graph with maximum degree at most $\Delta$ and no clique of size $\omega$, then $$\chi(G) \leq 72\Delta\sqrt{\frac{\ln(\omega)}{\ln(\Delta)}}.$$ This implies that for sufficiently large $\Delta$, if $\omega^{(72c)^2} \leq \Delta$ then $\chi(G) \leq \Delta/c$.

This bound actually holds for the list-chromatic and even the correspondence-chromatic number (also known as the DP-chromatic number). In fact, we prove what we call a "local version" of it, a result implying the existence of a coloring when the number of available colors for each vertex depends on local parameters, like the degree and the clique number of its neighborhood. Our result simultaneously implies the linear improvement over the "greedy bound" and the two aforementioned results of Johansson.

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.