We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Mathematics > Number Theory

Title: The sets of Dirichlet non-improvable numbers vs well-approximable numbers

Abstract: Let $\Psi :[1,\infty )\rightarrow \mathbb{R}_{+}$ be a non-decreasing function, $a_{n}(x)$ the $n$'{th} partial quotient of $x$ and $q_{n}(x)$ the denominator of the $n$'{th} convergent. The set of $\Psi $-Dirichlet non-improvable numbers \begin{equation*} G(\Psi ):=\Big\{x\in \lbrack 0,1):a_{n}(x)a_{n+1}(x)\,>\,\Psi \big(q_{n}(x) \big)\ \mathrm{for\ infinitely\ many}\ n\in \mathbb{N}\Big\}, \end{equation*} is related with the classical set of $1/q^{2}\Psi (q)$-approximable numbers $ \mathcal{K}(\Psi )$ in the sense that $\mathcal{K}(3\Psi )\subset G(\Psi )$. Both of these sets enjoy the same $s$-dimensional Hausdorff measure criterion for $s\in (0,1)$. We prove that the set $G(\Psi )\setminus \mathcal{K}(3\Psi )$ is uncountable by proving that its Hausdorff dimension is the same as that for the sets $\mathcal{K}(\Psi )$ and $G(\Psi)$. This gives an affirmative answer to a question raised by Hussain-Kleinbock-Wadleigh-Wang (2018).
Comments: 17 pages, comments welcome, to appear in Ergodic Theory and Dynamical System
Subjects: Number Theory (math.NT); Dynamical Systems (math.DS)
Cite as: arXiv:1806.00618 [math.NT]
  (or arXiv:1806.00618v2 [math.NT] for this version)

Submission history

From: Mumtaz Hussain [view email]
[v1] Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:47:24 GMT (20kb)
[v2] Fri, 17 May 2019 01:58:38 GMT (17kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.