We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:


References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

Title: Argumentation for Explainable Scheduling (Full Paper with Proofs)

Abstract: Mathematical optimization offers highly-effective tools for finding solutions for problems with well-defined goals, notably scheduling. However, optimization solvers are often unexplainable black boxes whose solutions are inaccessible to users and which users cannot interact with. We define a novel paradigm using argumentation to empower the interaction between optimization solvers and users, supported by tractable explanations which certify or refute solutions. A solution can be from a solver or of interest to a user (in the context of 'what-if' scenarios). Specifically, we define argumentative and natural language explanations for why a schedule is (not) feasible, (not) efficient or (not) satisfying fixed user decisions, based on models of the fundamental makespan scheduling problem in terms of abstract argumentation frameworks (AFs). We define three types of AFs, whose stable extensions are in one-to-one correspondence with schedules that are feasible, efficient and satisfying fixed decisions, respectively. We extract the argumentative explanations from these AFs and the natural language explanations from the argumentative ones.
Comments: Full version (including proofs) of the paper published at AAAI-19
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:1811.05437 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:1811.05437v2 [cs.AI] for this version)

Submission history

From: Kristijonas Čyras [view email]
[v1] Tue, 13 Nov 2018 18:04:26 GMT (33kb)
[v2] Wed, 20 Feb 2019 11:45:03 GMT (33kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.