We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

q-fin.GN

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Quantitative Finance > General Finance

Title: Economics of disagreement -- financial intuition for the Rényi divergence

Abstract: Disagreement is an essential element of science and life in general. The language of probabilities and statistics is often used to describe disagreements quantitatively. In practice, however, we want much more than that. We want disagreements to be resolved. This leaves us with a substantial knowledge gap which is often perceived as a lack of practical intuition regarding probabilistic and statistical concepts.
Take for instance the R\'enyi divergence which is a well-known statistical quantity specifically designed as a measure of disagreement between probabilistic models. Despite its widespread use in science and engineering, the R\'enyi divergence remains a highly abstract axiomatically-motivated measure. Certainly, it offers no practical insight as to how disagreements can be resolved.
Here we propose to address disagreements using the methods of financial economics. In particular, we show how a large class of disagreements can be transformed into investment opportunities. The expected financial performance of such investments quantifies the amount of disagreement in a tangible way. This provides intuition for statistical concepts such as the R\'enyi divergence which becomes connected to the financial performance of optimized investments. Investment optimization takes into account individual opinions as well as attitudes towards risk. The result is a market-like social mechanism by which funds flow naturally to support a more accurate view. Such social mechanisms can help us with difficult disagreements (e.g., financial arguments concerning the future climate).
In terms of scientific validation, we used the findings of independent neurophysiological experiments as well as our own research on the equity premium.
Comments: 17 pages, 1 figure
Subjects: General Finance (q-fin.GN); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Information Theory (cs.IT); Statistics Theory (math.ST)
Journal reference: Entropy 22 (8), 860 (2020)
DOI: 10.3390/e22080860
Cite as: arXiv:1811.08308 [q-fin.GN]
  (or arXiv:1811.08308v7 [q-fin.GN] for this version)

Submission history

From: Andrei Soklakov N [view email]
[v1] Tue, 20 Nov 2018 15:15:59 GMT (54kb)
[v2] Sat, 8 Dec 2018 08:09:48 GMT (54kb)
[v3] Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:13:45 GMT (55kb)
[v4] Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:29:06 GMT (56kb)
[v5] Wed, 18 Dec 2019 13:28:47 GMT (61kb)
[v6] Wed, 1 Jul 2020 11:02:25 GMT (66kb)
[v7] Mon, 31 Aug 2020 09:30:00 GMT (67kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.