We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Quantum Physics

Title: Bell inequalities and counterfactual definiteness

Abstract: Counterfactual definiteness is widely considered as one of the key assumptions necessary for the obtention of Bell inequalities although J. S. Bell did not explicitly mention such a hypothesis in his celebrated 1964 theorem. We explain why Bell's omission was not because he considered it a natural implicit assumption but because it is indeed unnecessary for the obtention of his inequality. We point out the inconsistent way the counterfactual definiteness hypothesis is used by many researchers and that, although it passes unnoticed most of the times because it does not alter Bell theorem's final conclusions, it is fundamentally incorrect and has caused much confusion in some quarters that reject the Bell theorem owed to problems related with this inconsistent presumption. We explain the natural assumption that is implicit in the mathematical operations that lead to the inequalities and, although it is seldom explicitly elucidated, avoids the inconsistent use of the counterfactual definiteness hypothesis.
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:1911.00343 [quant-ph]
  (or arXiv:1911.00343v2 [quant-ph] for this version)

Submission history

From: Justo Lambare [view email]
[v1] Thu, 31 Oct 2019 12:18:52 GMT (11kb)
[v2] Tue, 21 Jan 2020 13:02:33 GMT (15kb)
[v3] Wed, 11 Mar 2020 12:37:02 GMT (16kb)
[v4] Thu, 28 May 2020 22:20:23 GMT (11kb)
[v5] Mon, 3 Aug 2020 14:17:06 GMT (30kb,D)
[v6] Tue, 13 Apr 2021 22:25:27 GMT (9kb)
[v7] Sun, 13 Jun 2021 23:49:51 GMT (10kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.