We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

math.NT

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Mathematics > Number Theory

Title: Purely singular splittings of cyclic groups

Abstract: Let $G$ be a finite abelian group.
We say that $M$ and $S$ form a \textsl{splitting} of $G$ if every nonzero element $g$ of $G$ has a unique representation of the form $g=ms$ with $m\in M$ and $s\in S$, while $0$ has no such representation. The splitting is called \textit{purely singular} if for each prime divisor $p$ of $|G|$, there is at least one element of $M$ is divisible by $p$.
In this paper, we mainly study the purely singular splittings of cyclic groups. We first prove that if $k\ge3$ is a positive integer such that $[-k+1, \,k]^*$ splits a cyclic group $\mathbb{Z}_m$, then $m=2k$. Next, we have the following general result. Suppose $M=[-k_1, \,k_2]^*$ splits $\mathbb{Z}_{n(k_1+k_2)+1}$ with $1\leq k_1< k_2$. If $n\geq 2$, then $k_1\leq n-2$ and $k_2\leq 2n-5$. Applying this result, we prove that if $M=[-k_1, \,k_2]^*$ splits $\mathbb{Z}_m$ purely singularly, and either $(i)$ $\gcd(s, \,m)=1$ for all $s\in S$ or $(ii)$ $m=2^{\alpha}p^{\beta}$ or $2^{\alpha}p_1p_2$ with $\alpha\geq 0$, $\beta\geq 1$ and $p$, $p_1$, $p_2$ odd primes, then $m=k_1+k_2+1$ or $k_1=0$ and $m=k_2+1$ or $2k_2+1$.
Subjects: Number Theory (math.NT)
Cite as: arXiv:2002.11872 [math.NT]
  (or arXiv:2002.11872v1 [math.NT] for this version)

Submission history

From: Pingzhi Yuan [view email]
[v1] Thu, 27 Feb 2020 02:02:21 GMT (13kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.