We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

physics.hist-ph

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Physics > History and Philosophy of Physics

Title: Big Bounce or Double Bang? A Reply to Craig and Sinclair on the Interpretation of Bounce Cosmologies

Abstract: On the orthodox interpretation of bounce cosmologies, a preceding universe was compressed to a small size before ``bouncing'' to form the present expanding universe. William Lane Craig and James Sinclair have argued that the orthodox interpretation is incorrect if the entropy reaches a minimum at the bounce. In their view, the interface between universes represents the birth of two expanding universes, i.e., a ``double bang'' instead of a ``big bounce''. Here, I reply to Craig and Sinclair in defense of the orthodox interpretation. Contrary to their interpretation, features of one universe explain features of the other universe and so must precede the other universe in time. Moreover, contrary to a crucial part of Craig and Sinclair's interpretation, there are bounce cosmologies in which the thermodynamic arrow of time is continuous through the bounce even though the entropy is ``reset'' at the bounce.
Comments: 34 pages, Published in Erkenntnis
Subjects: History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph)
DOI: 10.1007/s10670-020-00278-5
Cite as: arXiv:2006.07748 [physics.hist-ph]
  (or arXiv:2006.07748v1 [physics.hist-ph] for this version)

Submission history

From: Daniel Linford [view email]
[v1] Sun, 14 Jun 2020 00:03:01 GMT (38kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.