We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

q-bio.QM

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Quantitative Biology > Quantitative Methods

Title: Transmission of droplet-conveyed infectious agents such as SARS-CoV-2 by speech and vocal exercises during speech therapy: preliminary experiment concerning airflow velocity

Abstract: Purpose Infectious agents, such as SARS-CoV-2, can be carried by droplets expelled during breathing. The spatial dissemination of droplets varies according to their initial velocity. After a short literature review, our goal was to determine the velocity of the exhaled air during vocal exercises. Methods A propylene glycol cloud produced by 2 e-cigarettes' users allowed visualization of the exhaled air emitted during vocal exercises. Airflow velocities were measured during the first 200 ms of a long exhalation, a sustained vowel /a/ and varied vocal exercises. For the long exhalation and the sustained vowel /a/, the decrease of airflow velocity was measured until 3 s. Results were compared with a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) study using boundary conditions consistent with our experimental study. Results Regarding the production of vowels, higher velocities were found in loud and whispered voices than in normal voice. Voiced consonants like /3/ or /v/ generated higher velocities than vowels. Some voiceless consonants, e.g., /t/ generated high velocities, but long exhalation had the highest velocities. Semi-occluded vocal tract exercises generated faster airflow velocities than loud speech, with a decreased velocity during voicing. The initial velocity quickly decreased as was shown during a long exhalation or a sustained vowel /a/. Velocities were consistent with the CFD data. Conclusion Initial velocity of the exhaled air is a key factor influencing droplets trajectory. Our study revealed that vocal exercises produce a slower airflow than long exhalation. Speech therapy should, therefore, not be associated with an increased risk of contamination when implementing standard recommendations.
Comments: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Springer Verlag, 2020
Subjects: Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM); Fluid Dynamics (physics.flu-dyn)
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06200-7
Cite as: arXiv:2101.03907 [q-bio.QM]
  (or arXiv:2101.03907v1 [q-bio.QM] for this version)

Submission history

From: Gilles Bouchet [view email]
[v1] Wed, 6 Jan 2021 08:38:49 GMT (1363kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.