We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Statistics > Applications

Title: Evaluation of point forecasts for extreme events using consistent scoring functions

Abstract: We present a method for comparing point forecasts in a region of interest, such as the tails or centre of a variable's range. This method cannot be hedged, in contrast to conditionally selecting events to evaluate and then using a scoring function that would have been consistent (or proper) prior to event selection. Our method also gives decompositions of scoring functions that are consistent for the mean or a particular quantile or expectile. Each member of each decomposition is itself a consistent scoring function that emphasises performance over a selected region of the variable's range. The score of each member of the decomposition has a natural interpretation rooted in optimal decision theory. It is the weighted average of economic regret over user decision thresholds, where the weight emphasises those decision thresholds in the corresponding region of interest.
Comments: 17 pages, 6 figures, 4 tables. Changes in latest version are all minor: Corrected minor typos in Table 4. Replaced $I_0$ with $I_0 \times I_0$ in three locations (pp. 7,8,15). Updated Strategy in Option 1 (p. 4) so that it is optimal
Subjects: Applications (stat.AP)
MSC classes: 62C05, 91B06
Cite as: arXiv:2102.00577 [stat.AP]
  (or arXiv:2102.00577v2 [stat.AP] for this version)

Submission history

From: Robert Taggart [view email]
[v1] Mon, 1 Feb 2021 00:54:56 GMT (1203kb,D)
[v2] Mon, 8 Mar 2021 10:02:36 GMT (1203kb,D)
[v3] Tue, 30 Nov 2021 09:59:49 GMT (1203kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.