We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

stat.AP

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Statistics > Applications

Title: What is the probability that a vaccinated person is shielded from Covid-19? A Bayesian MCMC based reanalysis of published data with emphasis on what should be reported as 'efficacy'

Abstract: Based on the information communicated in press releases, and finally published towards the end of 2020 by Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca, we have built up a simple Bayesian model, in which the main quantity of interest plays the role of {\em vaccine efficacy} (`$\epsilon$'). The resulting Bayesian Network is processed by a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), implemented in JAGS interfaced to R via rjags. As outcome, we get several probability density functions (pdf's) of $\epsilon$, each conditioned on the data provided by the three pharma companies. The result is rather stable against large variations of the number of people participating in the trials and it is `somehow' in good agreement with the results provided by the companies, in the sense that their values correspond to the most probable value (`mode') of the pdf's resulting from MCMC, thus reassuring us about the validity of our simple model. However we maintain that the number to be reported as `vaccine efficacy' should be the mean of the distribution, rather than the mode, as it was already very clear to Laplace about 250 years ago (its `rule of succession' follows from the simplest problem of the kind). This is particularly important in the case in which the number of successes equals the numbers of trials, as it happens with the efficacy against `severe forms' of infection, claimed by Moderna to be 100%. The implication of the various uncertainties on the predicted number of vaccinated infectees is also shown, using both MCMC and approximated formulae.
Comments: 30 pages, 8 figures, subsection 6.1 added in this new version
Subjects: Applications (stat.AP); History and Overview (math.HO); Populations and Evolution (q-bio.PE); Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:2102.11022 [stat.AP]
  (or arXiv:2102.11022v3 [stat.AP] for this version)

Submission history

From: Giulio D'Agostini [view email]
[v1] Mon, 15 Feb 2021 22:02:35 GMT (460kb)
[v2] Tue, 31 Aug 2021 15:30:38 GMT (460kb)
[v3] Mon, 6 Sep 2021 14:18:41 GMT (461kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.