We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Economics > General Economics

Title: Welfare v. Consent: On the Optimal Penalty for Harassment

Abstract: The economic approach to determine optimal legal policies involves maximizing a social welfare function. We propose an alternative: a consent-approach that seeks to promote consensual interactions and deter non-consensual interactions. The consent-approach does not rest upon inter-personal utility comparisons or value judgments about preferences. It does not require any additional information relative to the welfare-approach. We highlight the contrast between the welfare-approach and the consent-approach using a stylized model inspired by seminal cases of harassment and the #MeToo movement. The social welfare maximizing penalty for harassment in our model can be zero under the welfare-approach but not under the consent-approach.
Comments: 38 pages, 3 figures
Subjects: General Economics (econ.GN); Theoretical Economics (econ.TH)
Cite as: arXiv:2103.00734 [econ.GN]
  (or arXiv:2103.00734v1 [econ.GN] for this version)

Submission history

From: Ratul Das Chaudhury [view email]
[v1] Mon, 1 Mar 2021 03:52:41 GMT (265kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.