We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

astro-ph.GA

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Astrophysics > Astrophysics of Galaxies

Title: The tidal evolution of dark matter substructure -- II. The impact of artificial disruption on subhalo mass functions and radial profiles

Abstract: Several recent studies have indicated that artificial subhalo disruption (the spontaneous, non-physical disintegration of a subhalo) remains prevalent in state-of-the-art dark matter-only cosmological simulations. In order to quantify the impact of disruption on the inferred subhalo demographics, we augment the semi-analytical SatGen dynamical subhalo evolution model with an improved treatment of tidal stripping that is calibrated using the DASH database of idealized high-resolution simulations of subhalo evolution, which are free from artificial disruption. We also develop a model of artificial disruption that reproduces the statistical properties of disruption in the Bolshoi simulation. Using this framework, we predict subhalo mass functions (SHMFs), number density profiles, and substructure mass fractions and study how these quantities are impacted by artificial disruption and mass resolution limits. We find that artificial disruption affects these quantities at the $10-20\%$ level, ameliorating previous concerns that it may suppress the SHMF by as much as a factor of two. We demonstrate that semi-analytical substructure modeling must include orbit integration in order to properly account for splashback haloes, which make up roughly half of the subhalo population. We show that the resolution limit of $N$-body simulations, rather than artificial disruption, is the primary cause of the radial bias in subhalo number density found in dark matter-only simulations. Hence, we conclude that the mass resolution remains the primary limitation of using such simulations to study subhaloes. Our model provides a fast, flexible, and accurate alternative to studying substructure statistics in the absence of both numerical resolution limits and artificial disruption.
Comments: 18 pages, 11 figures. Published in MNRAS. This arXiv version includes the changes described in the erratum
Subjects: Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA); Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
Journal reference: MNRAS 503, 4075 (2021, original manuscript) and MNRAS 508, 2944 (2021, erratum)
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab696
Cite as: arXiv:2103.01227 [astro-ph.GA]
  (or arXiv:2103.01227v2 [astro-ph.GA] for this version)

Submission history

From: Sheridan Green [view email]
[v1] Mon, 1 Mar 2021 19:00:00 GMT (2261kb,D)
[v2] Sun, 26 Sep 2021 18:09:00 GMT (2271kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.