We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

stat.ME

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Statistics > Machine Learning

Title: Comments on Leo Breiman's paper 'Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures' (Statistical Science, 2001, 16(3), 199-231)

Abstract: Breiman challenged statisticians to think more broadly, to step into the unknown, model-free learning world, with him paving the way forward. Statistics community responded with slight optimism, some skepticism, and plenty of disbelief. Today, we are at the same crossroad anew. Faced with the enormous practical success of model-free, deep, and machine learning, we are naturally inclined to think that everything is resolved. A new frontier has emerged; the one where the role, impact, or stability of the {\it learning} algorithms is no longer measured by prediction quality, but an inferential one -- asking the questions of {\it why} and {\it if} can no longer be safely ignored.
Comments: 12 pages, 2 figures
Subjects: Machine Learning (stat.ML); Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:2103.11327 [stat.ML]
  (or arXiv:2103.11327v1 [stat.ML] for this version)

Submission history

From: Jelena Bradic [view email]
[v1] Sun, 21 Mar 2021 07:40:37 GMT (450kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.