We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Title: Renormalizability of alternative theories of gravity: differences between power counting and entropy argument

Abstract: It is well known that General Relativity cannot be considered under the standard of a perturbatively renormalizable quantum field theory, but asymptotic safety is taken into account as a possibility for the formulation of gravity as a non-perturbative renormalizable theory. Recently, the entropy argument has however stepped into the discussion claiming for a "no-go" to the asymptotic safety argument. In this paper, we present simple counter-examples, considering alternative theories of gravity, to the entropy argument as further indications, among others, on the possible flows in the assumptions on which the latter is based on. We consider different theories, namely curvature based extensions of General Relativity as $f(R)$, $f(\mathcal{G})$, extensions of Teleparallel Gravity as $f(T)$, and Horava-Lifshitz gravity, working out the explicit spherically symmetric solutions in order to make a comparison between power counting and the entropy argument. Even in these cases, inconsistencies are found.
Comments: 13 pages. Accepted for publication in "Universe"
Subjects: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc); High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th)
Journal reference: Universe 7 (2021) no.5, 148
DOI: 10.3390/universe7050148
Cite as: arXiv:2105.05176 [gr-qc]
  (or arXiv:2105.05176v2 [gr-qc] for this version)

Submission history

From: Francesco Bajardi [view email]
[v1] Tue, 11 May 2021 16:28:44 GMT (286kb)
[v2] Fri, 14 May 2021 15:39:48 GMT (289kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.