We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

cs.LG

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Computer Science > Machine Learning

Title: Evaluation Metrics for Graph Generative Models: Problems, Pitfalls, and Practical Solutions

Abstract: Graph generative models are a highly active branch of machine learning. Given the steady development of new models of ever-increasing complexity, it is necessary to provide a principled way to evaluate and compare them. In this paper, we enumerate the desirable criteria for such a comparison metric and provide an overview of the status quo of graph generative model comparison in use today, which predominantly relies on maximum mean discrepancy (MMD). We perform a systematic evaluation of MMD in the context of graph generative model comparison, highlighting some of the challenges and pitfalls researchers inadvertently may encounter. After conducting a thorough analysis of the behaviour of MMD on synthetically-generated perturbed graphs as well as on recently-proposed graph generative models, we are able to provide a suitable procedure to mitigate these challenges and pitfalls. We aggregate our findings into a list of practical recommendations for researchers to use when evaluating graph generative models.
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Social and Information Networks (cs.SI); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:2106.01098 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2106.01098v2 [cs.LG] for this version)

Submission history

From: Bastian Rieck [view email]
[v1] Wed, 2 Jun 2021 12:04:29 GMT (595kb,D)
[v2] Mon, 11 Oct 2021 06:50:28 GMT (1978kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.