We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

cs.CV

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Computer Science > Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Title: Face Identification Proficiency Test Designed Using Item Response Theory

Abstract: Measures of face identification proficiency are essential to ensure accurate and consistent performance by professional forensic face examiners and others who perform face identification tasks in applied scenarios. Current proficiency tests rely on static sets of stimulus items, and so, cannot be administered validly to the same individual multiple times. To create a proficiency test, a large number of items of "known" difficulty must be assembled. Multiple tests of equal difficulty can be constructed then using subsets of items. Here, we introduce a proficiency test, the Triad Identity Matching (TIM) test, based on stimulus difficulty measures based on Item Response Theory (IRT). Participants view face-image "triads" (N=225) (two images of one identity and one image of a different identity) and select the different identity. In Experiment 1, university students (N=197) showed wide-ranging accuracy on the TIM test. Furthermore, IRT modeling demonstrated that the TIM test produces items of various difficulty levels. In Experiment 2, IRT-based item difficulty measures were used to partition the TIM test into three equally "easy" and three equally "difficult" subsets. Simulation results indicated that the full set, as well as curated subsets, of the TIM items yielded reliable estimates of subject ability. In summary, the TIM test can provide a starting point for developing a framework that is flexible, calibrated, and adaptive to measure proficiency across various ability levels (e.g., professionals or populations with face processing deficits)
Comments: 17 pages (including references), 7 figures
Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:2106.15323 [cs.CV]
  (or arXiv:2106.15323v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

Submission history

From: Geraldine Jeckeln [view email]
[v1] Tue, 22 Jun 2021 22:37:32 GMT (5566kb,D)
[v2] Thu, 1 Jul 2021 16:52:11 GMT (5566kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.