We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Computer Science > Digital Libraries

Title: When standard network measures fail to rank journals: A theoretical and empirical analysis

Abstract: Journal rankings are widely used and are often based on citation data in combination with a network perspective. We argue that some of these network-based rankings can produce misleading results. From a theoretical point of view, we show that the standard network modelling approach of citation data at the journal level (i.e., the projection of paper citations onto journals) introduces fictitious relations among journals. To overcome this problem, we propose a citation path perspective, and empirically show that rankings based on the network and the citation path perspective are very different. Based on our theoretical and empirical analysis, we highlight the limitations of standard network metrics, and propose a method to overcome these limitations and compute journal rankings.
Comments: 17 pages, 6 Figures, 2 Tables
Subjects: Digital Libraries (cs.DL); Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Social and Information Networks (cs.SI); Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2106.15541 [cs.DL]
  (or arXiv:2106.15541v1 [cs.DL] for this version)

Submission history

From: Giacomo Vaccario Dr. [view email]
[v1] Tue, 29 Jun 2021 16:20:33 GMT (479kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.