We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

astro-ph.CO

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

Title: Machine learning astrophysics from 21 cm lightcones: impact of network architectures and signal contamination

Abstract: Imaging the cosmic 21 cm signal will map out the first billion years of our Universe. The resulting 3D lightcone (LC) will encode the properties of the unseen first galaxies and physical cosmology. Here, we build on previous work using neural networks (NNs) to infer astrophysical parameters directly from 21 cm LC images. We introduce recurrent neural networks (RNNs), capable of efficiently characterizing the evolution along the redshift axis of 21 cm LC images. Using a large database of simulated cosmic 21 cm LCs, we compare the relative performance in parameter estimation of different network architectures. These including two types of RNNs, which differ in their complexity, as well as a more traditional convolutional neural network (CNN). For the ideal case of no instrumental effects, our simplest and easiest to train RNN performs the best, with a mean squared parameter estimation error (MSE) that is lower by a factor of $\ge 2$ compared with the other architectures studied here, and a factor of $\ge 8$ lower than the previously-studied CNN. We also corrupt the cosmic signal by adding noise expected from a 1000 h integration with the Square Kilometre Array, as well as excising a foreground-contaminated 'horizon wedge'. Parameter prediction errors increase when the NNs are trained on these contaminated LC images, though recovery is still good even in the most pessimistic case (with $R^2 \ge 0.5-0.95$). However, we find no notable differences in performance between network architectures on the contaminated images. We argue this is due to the size of our data set, highlighting the need for larger data sets and/or better data augmentation in order to maximize the potential of NNs in 21 cm parameter estimation.
Comments: 15 pages, 11 figures, updated to match the version published in MNRAS, minor changes
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO); Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA)
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab3215
Cite as: arXiv:2107.00018 [astro-ph.CO]
  (or arXiv:2107.00018v2 [astro-ph.CO] for this version)

Submission history

From: David Prelogović [view email]
[v1] Wed, 30 Jun 2021 18:00:02 GMT (10120kb,D)
[v2] Wed, 16 Feb 2022 17:53:04 GMT (10193kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.