We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Statistics > Machine Learning

Title: Valid prediction intervals for regression problems

Abstract: Over the last few decades, various methods have been proposed for estimating prediction intervals in regression settings, including Bayesian methods, ensemble methods, direct interval estimation methods and conformal prediction methods. An important issue is the calibration of these methods: the generated prediction intervals should have a predefined coverage level, without being overly conservative. In this work, we review the above four classes of methods from a conceptual and experimental point of view. Results on benchmark data sets from various domains highlight large fluctuations in performance from one data set to another. These observations can be attributed to the violation of certain assumptions that are inherent to some classes of methods. We illustrate how conformal prediction can be used as a general calibration procedure for methods that deliver poor results without a calibration step.
Comments: submitted to AI Review
Subjects: Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
DOI: 10.1007/s10462-022-10178-5
Cite as: arXiv:2107.00363 [stat.ML]
  (or arXiv:2107.00363v3 [stat.ML] for this version)

Submission history

From: Nicolas Dewolf [view email]
[v1] Thu, 1 Jul 2021 10:59:36 GMT (1300kb,D)
[v2] Mon, 13 Dec 2021 08:29:54 GMT (1304kb,D)
[v3] Tue, 8 Mar 2022 16:00:34 GMT (1304kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.