We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Title: Can we bypass no-go theorem for Ricci-inverse Gravity?

Authors: Indranil Das (CEBS Mumbai), Joseph P Johnson, S. Shankaranarayanan (IIT Bombay)
Abstract: Recently, Amendola et al. proposed a geometrical theory of gravity containing higher-order derivative terms. The authors introduced anticurvature scalar $(A)$, which is the trace of the inverse of the Ricci tensor ($A^{\mu\nu} = R_{\mu\nu}^{-1}$). In this work, we consider two classes of Ricci-inverse -- Class I and Class II -- models. Class I models are of the form $f(R, A)$ where $f$ is a function of Ricci and anticurvature scalars. Class II models are of the form ${\cal F}(R, A^{\mu\nu}A_{\mu\nu})$ where ${\cal F}$ is a function of Ricci scalar and square of anticurvature tensor. For both these classes of models, we numerically solve the modified Friedmann equations in the redshift range $1500 < z < 0$. We show that the late-time evolution of the Universe, i.e., evolution from matter-dominated epoch to accelerated expansion epoch, can not be explained by these two classes of models. Using the reduced action approach, we show why we can not bypass the no-go theorem for Ricci-inverse gravity models. Finally, we discuss the implications of our analysis for the early-Universe cosmology.
Comments: 35 pages, 13 figures, 2 tables
Subjects: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc); Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO); High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th)
Cite as: arXiv:2108.00992 [gr-qc]
  (or arXiv:2108.00992v1 [gr-qc] for this version)

Submission history

From: Joseph P Johnson [view email]
[v1] Mon, 2 Aug 2021 15:42:56 GMT (7526kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.