We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

eess.IV

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Electrical Engineering and Systems Science > Image and Video Processing

Title: Cascading Neural Network Methodology for Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Radiographic Detection and Classification of Lead-Less Implanted Electronic Devices within the Chest

Abstract: Background & Purpose: Chest X-Ray (CXR) use in pre-MRI safety screening for Lead-Less Implanted Electronic Devices (LLIEDs), easily overlooked or misidentified on a frontal view (often only acquired), is common. Although most LLIED types are "MRI conditional": 1. Some are stringently conditional; 2. Different conditional types have specific patient- or device- management requirements; and 3. Particular types are "MRI unsafe". This work focused on developing CXR interpretation-assisting Artificial Intelligence (AI) methodology with: 1. 100% detection for LLIED presence/location; and 2. High classification in LLIED typing. Materials & Methods: Data-mining (03/1993-02/2021) produced an AI Model Development Population (1,100 patients/4,871 images) creating 4,924 LLIED Region-Of-Interests (ROIs) (with image-quality grading) used in Training, Validation, and Testing. For developing the cascading neural network (detection via Faster R-CNN and classification via Inception V3), "ground-truth" CXR annotation (ROI labeling per LLIED), as well as inference display (as Generated Bounding Boxes (GBBs)), relied on a GPU-based graphical user interface. Results: To achieve 100% LLIED detection, probability threshold reduction to 0.00002 was required by Model 1, resulting in increasing GBBs per LLIED-related ROI. Targeting LLIED-type classification following detection of all LLIEDs, Model 2 multi-classified to reach high-performance while decreasing falsely positive GBBs. Despite 24% suboptimal ROI image quality, classification was correct in 98.9% and AUCs for the 9 LLIED-types were 1.00 for 8 and 0.92 for 1. For all misclassification cases: 1. None involved stringently conditional or unsafe LLIEDs; and 2. Most were attributable to suboptimal images. Conclusion: This project successfully developed a LLIED-related AI methodology supporting: 1. 100% detection; and 2. Typically 100% type classification.
Comments: 23 pages, 4 figures
Subjects: Image and Video Processing (eess.IV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2108.11954 [eess.IV]
  (or arXiv:2108.11954v2 [eess.IV] for this version)

Submission history

From: Mutlu Demirer [view email]
[v1] Wed, 25 Aug 2021 19:29:48 GMT (552kb)
[v2] Tue, 26 Apr 2022 21:01:33 GMT (568kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.