We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

cs.AI

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Computer Science > Computation and Language

Title: The Case for Claim Difficulty Assessment in Automatic Fact Checking

Abstract: Fact-checking is the process of evaluating the veracity of claims (i.e., purported facts). In this opinion piece, we raise an issue that has received little attention in prior work -- that some claims are far more difficult to fact-check than others. We discuss the implications this has for both practical fact-checking and research on automated fact-checking, including task formulation and dataset design. We report a manual analysis undertaken to explore factors underlying varying claim difficulty and identify several distinct types of difficulty. We motivate this new claim difficulty prediction task as beneficial to both automated fact-checking and practical fact-checking organizations.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)
Cite as: arXiv:2109.09689 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2109.09689v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

Submission history

From: Anubrata Das [view email]
[v1] Mon, 20 Sep 2021 16:59:50 GMT (48kb)
[v2] Fri, 4 Feb 2022 22:16:51 GMT (416kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.