We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

cs.CL

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Computer Science > Computation and Language

Title: The Case for Claim Difficulty Assessment in Automatic Fact Checking

Abstract: Fact-checking is the process (human, automated, or hybrid) by which claims (i.e., purported facts) are evaluated for veracity. In this article, we raise an issue that has received little attention in prior work - that some claims are far more difficult to fact-check than others. We discuss the implications this has for both practical fact-checking and research on automated fact-checking, including task formulation and dataset design. We report a manual analysis undertaken to explore factors underlying varying claim difficulty and categorize several distinct types of difficulty. We argue that prediction of claim difficulty is a missing component of today's automated fact-checking architectures, and we describe how this difficulty prediction task might be split into a set of distinct subtasks.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)
Cite as: arXiv:2109.09689 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2109.09689v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

Submission history

From: Anubrata Das [view email]
[v1] Mon, 20 Sep 2021 16:59:50 GMT (48kb)
[v2] Fri, 4 Feb 2022 22:16:51 GMT (416kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.