We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

stat

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

Title: Chess AI: Competing Paradigms for Machine Intelligence

Abstract: Endgame studies have long served as a tool for testing human creativity and intelligence. We find that they can serve as a tool for testing machine ability as well. Two of the leading chess engines, Stockfish and Leela Chess Zero (LCZero), employ significantly different methods during play. We use Plaskett's Puzzle, a famous endgame study from the late 1970s, to compare the two engines. Our experiments show that Stockfish outperforms LCZero on the puzzle. We examine the algorithmic differences between the engines and use our observations as a basis for carefully interpreting the test results. Drawing inspiration from how humans solve chess problems, we ask whether machines can possess a form of imagination. On the theoretical side, we describe how Bellman's equation may be applied to optimize the probability of winning. To conclude, we discuss the implications of our work on artificial intelligence (AI) and artificial general intelligence (AGI), suggesting possible avenues for future research.
Comments: 15 pages, 8 figures
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
DOI: 10.3390/e24040550
Cite as: arXiv:2109.11602 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2109.11602v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

Submission history

From: Alexander Turk [view email]
[v1] Thu, 23 Sep 2021 19:11:57 GMT (37kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.