We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:


References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Computer Science > Computation and Language

Title: The Irrationality of Neural Rationale Models

Abstract: Neural rationale models are popular for interpretable predictions of NLP tasks. In these, a selector extracts segments of the input text, called rationales, and passes these segments to a classifier for prediction. Since the rationale is the only information accessible to the classifier, it is plausibly defined as the explanation. Is such a characterization unconditionally correct? In this paper, we argue to the contrary, with both philosophical perspectives and empirical evidence suggesting that rationale models are, perhaps, less rational and interpretable than expected. We call for more rigorous and comprehensive evaluations of these models to ensure desired properties of interpretability are indeed achieved. The code can be found at this https URL
Comments: 10 pages (7 pages of main text), 2 figures
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2110.07550 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2110.07550v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

Submission history

From: Yiming Zheng [view email]
[v1] Thu, 14 Oct 2021 17:22:10 GMT (715kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.