We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

cs.CR

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Computer Science > Cryptography and Security

Title: Scaling Blockchains: Can Elected Committees Help?

Abstract: In the high-stakes race to develop more scalable blockchains, some platforms (Cosmos, EOS, TRON, etc.) have adopted committee-based consensus protocols, whereby the blockchain's record-keeping rights are entrusted to a committee of elected block producers. In theory, the smaller the committee, the faster the blockchain can reach consensus and the more it can scale. What's less clear, is whether this mechanism ensures that honest committees can be consistently elected, given voters typically have limited information. Using EOS' Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) protocol as a backdrop, we show that identifying the optimal voting strategy is complex and practically out of reach. We empirically characterize some simpler (suboptimal) voting strategies that token holders resort to in practice and show that these nonetheless converge to optimality, exponentially quickly. This yields efficiency gains over other PoS protocols that rely on randomized block producer selection. Our results suggest that (elected) committee-based consensus, as implemented in DPoS, can be robust and efficient, despite its complexity.
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Information Theory (cs.IT); General Economics (econ.GN); Trading and Market Microstructure (q-fin.TR)
Cite as: arXiv:2110.08673 [cs.CR]
  (or arXiv:2110.08673v1 [cs.CR] for this version)

Submission history

From: Gerry Tsoukalas [view email]
[v1] Sat, 16 Oct 2021 22:14:49 GMT (643kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.