We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Computer Science > Machine Learning

Title: AequeVox: Automated Fairness Testing of Speech Recognition Systems

Authors: Sai Sathiesh Rajan (1), Sakshi Udeshi (1), Sudipta Chattopadhyay (1) ((1) Singapore University of Technology and Design)
Abstract: Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems have become ubiquitous. They can be found in a variety of form factors and are increasingly important in our daily lives. As such, ensuring that these systems are equitable to different subgroups of the population is crucial. In this paper, we introduce, AequeVox, an automated testing framework for evaluating the fairness of ASR systems. AequeVox simulates different environments to assess the effectiveness of ASR systems for different populations. In addition, we investigate whether the chosen simulations are comprehensible to humans. We further propose a fault localization technique capable of identifying words that are not robust to these varying environments. Both components of AequeVox are able to operate in the absence of ground truth data.
We evaluated AequeVox on speech from four different datasets using three different commercial ASRs. Our experiments reveal that non-native English, female and Nigerian English speakers generate 109%, 528.5% and 156.9% more errors, on average than native English, male and UK Midlands speakers, respectively. Our user study also reveals that 82.9% of the simulations (employed through speech transformations) had a comprehensibility rating above seven (out of ten), with the lowest rating being 6.78. This further validates the fairness violations discovered by AequeVox. Finally, we show that the non-robust words, as predicted by the fault localization technique embodied in AequeVox, show 223.8% more errors than the predicted robust words across all ASRs.
Comments: 31 pages, 9 figures, submitted to 25th International Conference on Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering , for associated code, see this https URL
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2110.09843 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2110.09843v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

Submission history

From: Sai Sathiesh Rajan [view email]
[v1] Tue, 19 Oct 2021 10:56:46 GMT (15923kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.