We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

econ

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Computer Science > Computers and Society

Title: On the Fairness of Machine-Assisted Human Decisions

Abstract: When machine-learning algorithms are deployed in high-stakes decisions, we want to ensure that their deployment leads to fair and equitable outcomes. This concern has motivated a fast-growing literature that focuses on diagnosing and addressing disparities in machine predictions. However, many machine predictions are deployed to assist in decisions where a human decision-maker retains the ultimate decision authority. In this article, we therefore consider how properties of machine predictions affect the resulting human decisions. We show in a formal model that the inclusion of a biased human decision-maker can revert common relationships between the structure of the algorithm and the qualities of resulting decisions. Specifically, we document that excluding information about protected groups from the prediction may fail to reduce, and may even increase, ultimate disparities. While our concrete results rely on specific assumptions about the data, algorithm, and decision-maker, they show more broadly that any study of critical properties of complex decision systems, such as the fairness of machine-assisted human decisions, should go beyond focusing on the underlying algorithmic predictions in isolation.
Subjects: Computers and Society (cs.CY); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Machine Learning (cs.LG); General Economics (econ.GN); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:2110.15310 [cs.CY]
  (or arXiv:2110.15310v1 [cs.CY] for this version)

Submission history

From: Jann Spiess [view email]
[v1] Thu, 28 Oct 2021 17:24:45 GMT (21kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.