We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

math.CV

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Mathematics > Complex Variables

Title: Definitions of quasiconformality and exceptional sets

Abstract: We present a new generalized metric definition of quasiconformality for Euclidean space, requiring that at each point there exists a sequence of uncentered open sets with bounded eccentricity shrinking to that point such that the images also have bounded eccentricity. This generalizes results of Gehring and Heinonen-Koskela on the metric definition of quasiconformality. We also study exceptional sets for this definition, in connection with sets that are negligible for extremal distance. We introduce the class of CNED sets, generalizing the notion of NED sets studied by Ahlfors-Beurling. A set $E$ is CNED if the conformal modulus of a curve family is not affected when one restricts to the subfamily intersecting $E$ at countably many points. We show as our main theorem that CNED sets are exceptional for the definition of quasiconformality. Our main theorem is an ultimate generalization of results of Gehring, Heinonen-Koskela, and Kallunki-Koskela. We prove that several classes of sets that were known to be exceptional are also CNED, including sets of $\sigma$-finite Hausdorff $(n-1)$-measure and boundaries of domains with $n$-integrable quasihyperbolic distance. Thus, this work puts in common framework many known results on the problem of quasiconformal removability and provides evidence that the CNED condition should also be necessary for removability. We prove that countable unions of closed (C)NED sets are (C)NED, and therefore we enlarge significantly the known classes of quasiconformally removable sets. On the other hand, we present examples showing that unions of non-closed negligible or exceptional sets need not be negligible or exceptional, respectively. Finally, we give an application to the problem of rigidity of circle domains.
Comments: 72 pages, 6 figures
Subjects: Complex Variables (math.CV); Classical Analysis and ODEs (math.CA); Dynamical Systems (math.DS)
MSC classes: Primary 30C62, 30C65, Secondary 30C35, 30C75, 30C85, 31A15, 31B15, 46E35
Cite as: arXiv:2111.02918 [math.CV]
  (or arXiv:2111.02918v1 [math.CV] for this version)

Submission history

From: Dimitrios Ntalampekos [view email]
[v1] Thu, 4 Nov 2021 14:52:28 GMT (769kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.